Evaluating the quality of multiple‐choice question pilot database: A global educator‐created tool for concept‐based pharmacology learning

Author:

Netere Adeladlew Kassie1ORCID,Hughes Tony1,Babey Anna‐Marie2ORCID,Hawes Martin3ORCID,Mifsud Janet4ORCID,Kelly John P.5,Liang Willmann6ORCID,Hernandez Mark7,Karpa Kelly8,Al‐Sallami Hesham9ORCID,Fernandes Lynette B.10,Aronsson Patrik11,Restini Carolina12ORCID,Caetano Crowley Fabiana13ORCID,Djouma Elvan14,Hinton Tina15,Liu Johnson J.16,Mraiche Fatima17ORCID,White Paul J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia

2. School of Science & Technology University of New England Armidale New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Surrey UK

4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Malta Msida Malta

5. Discipline of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine University of Galway

6. Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong

7. East Tennessee State University USA

8. Department of Medical Education East Tennessee State University Quillen College of Medicine

9. School of Pharmacy University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand

10. School of Biomedical Sciences University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia

11. Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

12. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University USA

13. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

14. Department of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

15. Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney New South Wales Australia

16. Department of Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

17. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractThe Core Concepts of Pharmacology (CCP) initiative is developing educational resources to transform pharmacology education into a concept‐based approach. This study evaluated the quality of global educator‐created MCQs in generating items for the pharmacology concept inventory (PCI) instrument and developed as a resource for learning pharmacology fundamental concepts. A panel of 22 global pharmacology experts recruited from the CCP initiative research team participated in the MCQ pilot database design and evaluation. The quality analysis framework of the MCQs in the pilot database included four assessment tools: item writing guidelines (IWGs), Bloom's taxonomy, the CCP, and the MCQ design format. A two‐phase evaluation process was involved, including inter‐rater agreement on item quality, followed by resolving conflicts that occurred in quality assessment. The chi‐square (χ2) test of independence and Cramer's V correlation tests were utilized to measure the relationship among quality assessment attributes. About 200 MCQs were gathered and 98% underwent expert evaluation. Nearly 80% addressed one or more CCP, with 52% designed using a context‐dependent format. However, only 40% addressed higher levels of Bloom's cognitive domain and 10% adhered to all IWGs. A strong positive correlation was observed between the context‐based item format and its effectiveness in assessing the higher cognitive domain, the main CCP and improved IWGs adherence. Context‐based item construction can assess the higher cognitive skills and fundamental pharmacology concepts, showing potential for rigorous PCI development. The pilot database will store items to create the PCI, aiding the development of a concept‐based pharmacology curriculum.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3