Symptom validity indices in the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5

Author:

Shura Robert D.123ORCID,Rowland Jared A.124ORCID,Miskey Holly M.123ORCID,Ord Anna S.125ORCID,Magnante Anna T.123ORCID,Martindale Sarah L.126ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Salisbury VA Healthcare System Salisbury North Carolina USA

2. VA Mid‐Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center Durham North Carolina USA

3. Department of Neurology Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

4. Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

5. School of Psychology and Counseling Regent University Virginia Beach Virginia USA

6. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractThe use of symptom validity tests (SVTs) is standard practice in psychodiagnostic assessments. Embedded measures are indices within self‐report measures. To date, no embedded SVTs have been identified in the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5). This research aimed to develop and validate PCL‐5 SVTs in two samples of veterans. Participants completed one of two prospective research studies that included cognitive and psychological tests. Participants in Study 1 were veterans (N = 464) who served following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks; participants in Study 2 were veterans or service members (N = 338) who had been deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan. Both studies included the PCL‐5 and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS), the latter of which served as the criterion for identifying PCL‐5 SVTs. For Study 1, two separate SVTs were developed: the PCL‐5 Symptom Severity scale (PSS), based on the PCL‐5 total score, and the PCL‐5 Rare Items scale (PRI), based on PCL‐5 items infrequently endorsed at the highest item ratings. At the most conservative SIMS cutoff score, the PSS achieved excellent discrimination for both the Study 1, AUC = .840, and Study 2 samples, AUC = .858, with specific cutoff scores of ≥ 51 and ≥ 56 maximizing sensitivity while maintaining a specificity of .90. The PRI achieved good discrimination, AUCs = .760 and.726, respectively, with a cutoff score of 2 or higher indicated by both studies. The results of these two studies provide provisional support for these two embedded SVTs in the PCL‐5.

Funder

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

U.S. Department of Defense

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3