The impact of screening positive for hazardous alcohol use on the diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 among veterans

Author:

Sistad Rebecca E.12,Kimerling Rachel34ORCID,Schnurr Paula P.56,Bovin Michelle J.27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Psychiatry Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Dissemination and Training Division National Center for PTSD VA Palo Alto Healthcare System Palo Alto California USA

4. Center for Innovation to Implementation Palo Alto California USA

5. Executive Division National Center for PTSD White River Junction Vermont USA

6. Department of Psychiatry Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hanover New Hampshire USA

7. Behavioral Science Division National Center for PTSD VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractThe Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5) is a widely used self‐report measure of PTSD symptoms that has demonstrated strong psychometric properties across settings and samples. Co‐occurring hazardous alcohol use and PTSD are prevalent among veterans, and the effects of alcohol use may impact the performance of the PCL‐5. However, this possibility is untested. In this study, we evaluated the PCL‐5 diagnostic accuracy for veterans who did and did not screen positive for hazardous alcohol use according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT‐C). Participants were 385 veterans recruited from Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. Results indicated that PCL‐5 performance, AUC = .904, 95% CI [.870, .937], did not differ as a product of hazardous alcohol use. PCL‐5 diagnostic utility was comparably high for veterans with, AUC = .904; 95% CI [.846, .962], and without, AUC = .904 95% CI [.861, .946], positive AUDIT‐C screens. Although optimally efficient cutoff scores for veterans who screened positive were higher (i.e., 34–36) than for those with negative screens (i.e., 30), neither were significantly different from the overall PCL‐5 cutoff score (i.e., 32), suggesting that neither veterans with nor without positive AUDIT‐C screens require differential PCL‐5 cutoff scores. The results do underscore the importance of using PCL‐5 cutoff scores in concert with clinical judgment when establishing a provisional PTSD diagnosis and highlight the need for additional study of the impact of comorbidities on PCL‐5 diagnostic accuracy and cutoff scores.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3