Evaluation of Acarbose Bioequivalence in Healthy Chinese Populations Using Novel Pharmacodynamic End Points

Abstract

AbstractAcarbose is a widely used α‐glucosidase inhibitor for the management of postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent pilot studies on acarbose bioequivalence (BE) have successfully identified additional pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters as valid end points. Nevertheless, there was a scarcity of published pivotal studies using novel PD parameters. The purpose of the study is to investigate the acarbose BE using the new PD parameters. The study was conducted with an open, randomized, 2‐period crossover design. A total of 64 healthy Chinese volunteers received either the reference (R) or test (T) acarbose at a dose of 2×50 mg orally, followed by a 1‐week washout period. After sucrose treatment (baseline) and sucrose/acarbose co‐administration, serum glucose, and insulin concentrations were assessed. The rectifying approach yielded geometric mean ratios of 102.9% for maximum serum glucose concentration with deduction of glucose concentration at 0 hour and 105.3% for the area under the serum glucose concentration‐time curve profile 0‐2 hours after coadministration of sucrose and acarbose with deduction of baseline (AUC0‐2 h,r). The 90% confidence intervals of maximum serum glucose concentration with deduction of glucose concentration at 0 hour and the area under the serum glucose concentration‐time curve profile 0‐2 hours after coadministration of sucrose and acarbose with deduction of baseline all fell within the acceptance limits. The incidence of adverse events after the T or R drug was comparable, and healthy subjects were well tolerated. The findings of our investigation clearly show that the PD parameters of the rectifying method exhibit enhanced suitability and sensitivity when assessing acarbose BE in healthy participants. The T and R drugs were bioequivalent using the novel PD parameters, and both drugs demonstrated good safety and tolerability.