Recurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

Author:

Bülow S1,Christensen I J2,Harling H3,Kronborg O4,Fenger C5,Nielsen H J1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, H:S-Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

2. The Finsen Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark

3. Department of Surgery, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark

4. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

5. Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has resulted in local recurrence rates of 3–11 per cent compared with up to 38 per cent after conventional methods. The results of a prospective Danish study with a historical control group are presented. Methods Three hundred and eleven patients with a mobile rectal cancer had mesorectal excision with curative intent performed by certified surgeons and were followed for 3 years. Demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. A series of patients who had conventional operations for rectal cancer served as a control group. Results The cumulative 3-year local recurrence rate was 11 per cent after mesorectal excision compared with 30 per cent after conventional surgery (hazard ratio (HR) 0·33 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·21 to 0·52); P < 0·001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that only advanced age (HR 0·97 (95 per cent c.i. 0·94 to 1·00); P = 0·048) and tumour in the lower third of the rectum (HR 0·21 (95 per cent c.i. 0·04 to 1·97); P = 0·075) were marginal independent predictors of local recurrence after mesorectal excision. The cumulative crude 3-year survival rate was 77 per cent after mesorectal excision and 62 per cent after conventional surgery (HR 0·58 (95 per cent c.i. 0·43 to 0·77); P < 0·001). Age was the only independent predictor of death after mesorectal excision (HR 1·04 (95 per cent c.i. 1·02 to 1·07); P = 0·001). Conclusion Mesorectal excision is associated with a considerably lower risk of local recurrence and a better survival rate than conventional surgery, and is the optimum method for rectal cancer resection.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 96 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3