Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus on fertility‐sparing surgery for cervical cancer

Author:

Baiocchi Glauco1ORCID,Tsunoda Audrey Tieko2,Guitmann Gustavo3,Vieira Marcelo Andrade4,Zanvettor Paulo Henrique5,Silvestre Janiceli Blanca Carlotto Hablich6,Santos Marcelo Henrique7,Sacramento Raquel de Maria Maués8,de Araujo Eliel Oliveira9,Lopes Roberto Heleno9,Falcao Deraldo5,Lopes Andre10,Schmidt Ronaldo7,Lyra Jorge Soares11,Almeida Herbert Ives Barretto12,Casteleins William Augusto13,Cintra Georgia Fontes14,Zanini Lucas Adalberto Geraldi15,Reis Rosilene Jara16,Coelho Eid Gonçalves17,Fin Fábio Roberto18,Rezende Viviane19,Pançan Thais Dvulatk Marques6,Vieira Sabas Carlos20,Silva Jeancarllo Sousa21,de Andrade Manoel Rodrigues22,Carneiro Vandre Cabral Gomes23ORCID,Foiato Tariane Friedrich24,Ritt Guilherme Fonteles25,Ianaze Gustavo Castro26,Moretti‐Marques Renato27,Andrade Carlos Eduardo Mattos Cunha7,Maciel Luiza Freitas3,Lira Daniel Lourenço28,Medeiros Gustavo Mendes29,Leite Amanda Lira Santos30,Cucolicchio Guilherme Oliveira31,Tayeh Muhamed Read Ali32,Cruz Ricardo Pedrini33,Guth Gustavo Ziggiatti34,Leal Renato Mazon Lina Verde35,Magno Valentino Antonio36,Lopes Francisco Carlos Oliveira37,Laporte Gustavo Andreazza16,Pupo‐Nogueira Alexandre38,Barros Aldo Vieira30,da Cunha Juliano Rodrigues39,Pessini Suzana Arenhart36,Braganca Joana Froes40,Figueiredo Higino Felipe28,Loureiro Carlos Manoel Bulcão41,Bocanegra Ronald Enrique Delgado42,Affonso Renato José43,Fernandes Paulo Henrique de Souza39,Ribeiro Heber Salvador Castro1ORCID,Batista Thales Paulo44ORCID,Oliveira Alexandre Ferreira9,Ribeiro Reitan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. AC Camargo Cancer Center São Paulo Brazil

2. Erasto Gaertner Hospital Curitiba Brazil

3. National Cancer Institute Rio de Janeiro Brazil

4. Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

5. Aristides Maltez Hospital Salvador Brazil

6. ISPON Ponta Grossa Brazil

7. Barretos Cancer Hospital Barretos Brazil

8. Ophir Loyola Hospital Belem Brazil

9. Juiz de Fora Federal University Juiz de Fora Brazil

10. Sao Paulo State Institute of Cancer Sao Paulo Brazil

11. Oncoradium Rede de Oncologia Imperatriz Brazil

12. Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital Salvador Brazil

13. Centro de Oncologia do Paraná Curitiba Brazil

14. Brazilian Institute of Cancer Sao Paulo Brazil

15. Hospital de Caridade Ijuí Brazil

16. Santa Casa de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil

17. São Marcos Hospital Teresina Brazil

18. Instituto Femina Curitiba Brazil

19. Brasilia University Hospital Brasilia Brazil

20. Oncocenter Teresina Brazil

21. Amazonas State University Manaus Brazil

22. IMIP Recife Brazil

23. IMIP and Pernambuco Cancer Hospital Recife Brazil

24. Centro de Oncologia de Cascavel Cascavel Brazil

25. AMO and Obras Sociais Irma Dulce Salvador Brazil

26. Alfredo Abrao Cancer Hospital Campo Grande Brazil

27. Albert Einstein Hospital São Paulo Brazil

28. Fundação Centro de Oncologia do Estado do Amazonas ‐ FCECON Manaus Brazil

29. Campo Grande Cancer Hospital Campo Grande Brazil

30. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Maceió, Maceió Brazil

31. Santa Cada de Misericórdia de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto Brazil

32. Hospital UNIMED Litoral, Balneário Camburiú Brazil

33. Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição Porto Alegre Brazil

34. Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas Brazil

35. Federal University of Ceara Fortaleza Brazil

36. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

37. Londrina Cancer Hospital Londrina Brazil

38. Sirio Libanes Hospital São Paulo Brazil

39. Federal University of Uberlandia Uberlandia Brazil

40. Campinas State University Campinas Brazil

41. Sao Domingos Hospital and Aldenora Bello Hospital, São Luís Brazil

42. Santa Izabel Hospital Salvador Brazil

43. Hospital de Base de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto Brazil

44. IMIP and Federal University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveSeveral controversies remain on conservative management of cervical cancer. Our aim was to develop a consensus recommendation on important and novel topics of fertility‐sparing treatment of cervical cancer.MethodsThe consensus was sponsored by the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) from March 2020 to September 2020 and included a multidisciplinary team of 55 specialists. A total of 21 questions were addressed and they were assigned to specialists' groups that reviewed the literature and drafted preliminary recommendations. Further, the coordinators evaluated the recommendations that were classified by the level of evidence, and finally, they were voted by all participants.ResultsThe questions included controversial topics on tumor assessment, surgical treatment, and surveillance in conservative management of cervical cancer. The two topics with lower agreement rates were the role of minimally invasive approach in radical trachelectomy and parametrial preservation. Additionally, only three recommendations had <90% of agreement (fertility preservation in Stage Ib2, anti‐stenosis device, and uterine transposition).ConclusionsAs very few clinical trials have been developed in surgery for cervical cancer, most recommendations were supported by low levels of evidence. We addressed important and novel topics in conservative management of cervical cancer and our study may contribute to literature.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oncology,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference95 articles.

1. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries;Bray F;CA,2018

2. Instituto Nacional de Câncer Brasil ‐ Estimativa dos casos novos. (2019). Accessed December 30 2021.https://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/estado-capital/brasil#main-content

3. Characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: trachelectomy vs hysterectomy

4. Radical Trachelectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

5. Radical trachelectomy

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3