Proof-of-concept randomized phase II non-inferiority trial of simple versus type B2 hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer ≤2 cm (LESSER)

Author:

Carneiro Vandré Cabral GomesORCID,Batista Thales PauloORCID,Andrade Manoel RodriguesORCID,Barros Aldo VieiraORCID,Câmara Luciana Holanda Lima DornelasORCID,Ramalho Nathalia MoreiraORCID,Lucena Márcia AngéliaORCID,Fontão Diogenes Fernando SantosORCID,Tancredi Rodrigo,Silva Júnior Tyrone CésarORCID,Bezerra Artur Lício RochaORCID,Baiocchi GlaucoORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the non-inferiority and safety of simple hysterectomy in early stage (<2 cm) cervical cancer.MethodsThis proof-of-concept randomized phase II non-inferiority trial was performed between May 2015 and April 2018 in three oncological centers in Northeast Brazil. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stages IA2–IB1 cervical cancer and tumors ≤2 cm were treated with either simple or modified radical hysterectomy (Querleu–Morrow type B2). Intention-to-treat analysis was carried out. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival and secondary endpoints were overall survival, operative outcomes, adjuvant therapy, and patient’s health-related quality of life (QoL).ResultsA total of 40 patients underwent either simple hysterectomy (n=20) or modified radical hysterectomy (n=20). All patients except three underwent open procedures (n=37/40, 92.5%). At a median follow-up of 52.1 months (IQR 43.9–60.1), 3-year disease-free survival was 95% (95% CI 68% to 99%) after simple hysterectomy and 100% (95% CI 100% to 100%) after modified radical hysterectomy (log-rank p=0.30). The corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 90% (95% CI 64% to 97%) and 91% (95% CI 50% to 98%), respectively (log-rank p=0.46). The operative time was shorter after simple hysterectomy than after modified radical hysterectomy (150 min (IQR 137.5–180) vs 199.5 min (IQR 140–230); p=0.003), with a trend towards a longer time for vesical catheterization removal (1 day (IQR 1–1) vs 1 day (IQR 1–2); p=0.043). There was no post-operative mortality and the rates of post-operative complications were not statistically different between arms (15% and 25%; p=0.69). QoL questionnaires were received from only 17 patients (42.5%), with no major differences observed over time between the surgical arms.ConclusionsSimple hysterectomy is safe and potentially non-inferior to the radical surgery in patients with early-stage cervical cancer ≤2 cm.Trial Registration numberNCT02613286.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Oncology

Reference22 articles.

1. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) . Estimate 2023 – cancer incidence in Brazil, 2022. Available: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/estimativa/estado-capital/brasil [Accessed 21 Dec 2022].

2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) . NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for cervical cancer version 1.2022 (October 26, 2021), 2022. Available: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/ [Accessed 04 Dec 2022].

3. Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: Is there a role for less radical surgery?

4. Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study;Landoni;Eur J Surg Oncol,2012

5. Is less more in the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer?;Schaafsma;Curr Opin Oncol,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3