Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A Patient-Level Analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A Patient-Level Analysis

Published:2015-10-01 Issue:2 Volume:87 Page:273-282
ISSN:1522-1946
Container-title:Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
language:en
Short-container-title:Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent.

Author:

Kolli Kranthi K.¹²,van de Hoef Tim P.³,Effat Mohamed A.⁴²,Banerjee Rupak K.¹²,Peelukhana Srikara V.¹²,Succop Paul⁵,Leesar Massoud A.⁶,Imran Arif²⁴,Piek Jan J.³,Helmy Tarek A.⁷

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering; University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati Ohio

2. Veteran Affairs Medical Center; Cincinnati Ohio

3. Department of Cardiology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Division of Cardiovascular Disease; University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati Ohio

5. Department of Environmental Health; University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati Ohio

6. Division of Cardiovascular Disease; University of Alabama-Birmingham; Alabama

7. Division of Cardiology; Saint Louis University School of Medicine; St. Louis Missouri

Funder

Department of Veteran Affairs through VA Merit Review Grant

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/ccd.26063/fullpdf

Reference30 articles.

1. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention);Smith;Circulation,2006

2. Experience with revascularization procedures does matter: Low volume means worse outcome;Wijns;Eur Heart J,2010

3. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology;Kern;Circulation,2006

4. Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity;Meuwissen;Circulation,2002

5. Coronary physiology revisited: Practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory;Kern;Circulation,2000

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Assessment: Current Developments and Future Perspectives;Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications;2023

2. Synergistic prognostic value of coronary distensibility index and fractional flow reserve based cCTA for major adverse cardiac events in patients with Coronary artery disease;BMC Cardiovascular Disorders;2022-05-14

3. Comparison Between 5- and 1-Year Outcomes Using Cutoff Values of Pressure Drop Coefficient and Fractional Flow Reserve for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Diseases;Frontiers in Physiology;2021-07-14

4. Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions;Current Cardiology Reports;2021-06-03

5. A Hemodynamic Comparison of Myocardial Bridging and Coronary Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Computational Model With Experimental Evaluation;Journal of Biomechanical Engineering;2021-01-22