Detailed Monte‐Carlo characterization of a Faraday cup for proton therapy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundExperiments with ultra‐high dose rates in proton therapy are of increasing interest for potential treatment benefits. The Faraday Cup (FC) is an important detector for the dosimetry of such ultra‐high dose rate beams. So far, there is no consensus on the optimal design of a FC, or on the influence of beam properties and magnetic fields on shielding of the FC from secondary charged particles.PurposeTo perform detailed Monte Carlo simulations of a Faraday cup to identify and quantify all the charge contributions from primary protons and secondary particles that modify the efficiency of the FC response as a function of a magnetic field employed to improve the detector's reading.MethodsIn this paper, a Monte Carlo (MC) approach was used to investigate the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) FC and quantify contributions of charged particles to its signal for beam energies of 70, 150, and 228 MeV and magnetic fields between 0 and 25 mT. Finally, we compared our MC simulations to measurements of the response of the PSI FC.ResultsFor maximum magnetic fields, the efficiency (signal of the FC normalized to charged delivered by protons) of the PSI FC varied between 99.97% and 100.22% for the lowest and highest beam energy. We have shown that this beam energy‐dependence is mainly caused by contributions of secondary charged particles, which cannot be fully suppressed by the magnetic field. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that these contributions persist, making the FC efficiency beam energy dependent for fields up to 250 mT, posing inevitable limits on the accuracy of FC measurements if not corrected. In particular, we have identified a so far unreported loss of electrons via the outer surfaces of the absorber block and show the energy distributions of secondary electrons ejected from the vacuum window (VW) (up to several hundred keV), together with electrons ejected from the absorber block (up to several MeV). Even though, in general, simulations and measurements were well in agreement, the limitation of the current MC calculations to produce secondary electrons below 990 eV posed a limit in the efficiency simulations in the absence of a magnetic field as compared to the experimental data.ConclusionTOPAS‐based MC simulations allowed to identify various and previously unreported contributions to the FC signal, which are likely to be present in other FC designs. Estimating the beam energy dependence of the PSI FC for additional beam energies could allow for the implementation of an energy‐dependent correction factor to the signal. Dose estimates, based on accurate measurements of the number of delivered protons, provided a valid instrument to challenge the dose determined by reference ionization chambers, not only at ultra‐high dose rates but also at conventional dose rates.