Limited reproductive interference despite high rates of heterospecific pollen transfer among co‐occurring bat‐pollinated Burmeistera

Author:

Moreira‐Hernández Juan I.1ORCID,Ghai Harmeet1,Terzich Nicholas1,Zambrano‐Cevallos Ricardo2,Oleas Nora H.3ORCID,Muchhala Nathan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology and Whitney R. Harris World Ecology Center University of Missouri–St. Louis, One University Blvd St. Louis MO 63121 USA

2. Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Avenida 12 de Octubre 1076 y Roca Quito EC170143 Ecuador

3. Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y Cambio Climático and Carrera de Ingeniería en Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos, Facultad de Ciencias del Medio Ambiente Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Machala y Sabanilla Quito EC170301 Ecuador

Abstract

AbstractPremiseMany tropical plants are bat‐pollinated, but these mammals often carry copious, multispecific pollen loads making bat‐pollinated plants susceptible to heterospecific pollen deposition and reproductive interference. We investigated pollen transfer between sympatric bat‐pollinated Burmeistera species and their response to heterospecific pollen deposition from each other.MethodsWe quantified conspecific and heterospecific pollen deposition for two populations of B. ceratocarpa, a recipient species in heterospecific pollen transfer interactions, that co‐occur with different donor relatives (B. borjensis and B. glabrata). We then used a cross‐pollination scheme using pollen mixtures to assess the species' responses to heterospecific pollen deposition in terms of fruit abortion and seed production.ResultsBurmeistera ceratocarpa received significantly more heterospecific pollen from its relatives at both sites than its own pollen was deposited on its relatives. However, heterospecific pollen deposition only affected seed production by B. borjensis and B. glabrata, but not by B. ceratocarpa, suggesting that early acting post‐pollination barriers buffer the latter against reproductive interference. Crosses between sympatric and allopatric populations suggest that the study species are fully isolated in sympatry, while isolation between allopatric populations is strong but incomplete.ConclusionsWe did not observe evidence of reproductive interference among our study species, because either heterospecific pollen deposition did not affect their seed production (B. ceratocarpa) or they receive heterospecific pollen only rarely (B. borjensis and B. glabrata). Frequent heterospecific pollen deposition might favor the evolution of barriers against foreign pollen (as in B. ceratocarpa) that alleviate the competitive costs of sharing low fidelity pollinators with co‐occurring species.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3