Watering down the wine: European Union regulation of violent right‐wing extremism content and the securitisation of new online spaces

Author:

Flonk Danielle1,McNeil‐Willson Richard2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law Hitotsubashi University Kunitachi Japan

2. Institute of Security and Global Affairs Leiden University Den Haag Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractThe regulation of violent right‐wing extremist online content in the European Union is facing a conundrum. On the one hand, pressure to respond to concern over violent right‐wing extremism (or VRWE, a term used by the European Union to refer to ‘far right’) has led to a push to develop a coherent European‐wide response. On the one hand, this has led to a watering down or ‘loosening’ of the concept and implementation, to come to policy agreements between Member States. On the other hand, we have also seen a broadening and expansion of key concepts around VRWE to include more online practices. We argue that this combination of ‘loosening’ the definition of far right, whilst simultaneously ‘broadening’ what constitutes far‐right content, risks the securitisation of vast online practices ‐ muddying the means for developing coherent and effective responses to VRWE in online spheres. This paper aims to explore the framing and securitisation of violent right‐wing extremist content, by tracking the discursive construction of European content moderation policy tools over time.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Health Policy,Public Administration,Health (social science)

Reference71 articles.

1. ‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases

2. Guiding the censor's scissors: A framework to assess Internet filtering;Bambauer D. E.;Brooklyn Law School. Legal Studies Paper,2009

3. Beizaras and Levickas v Lithuania. (2020). European Court of Human Rights 14 January 2020.

4. Bolaños Somoano I.(2021).“The right leaning be memeing”: Extremist uses of internet memes and insights for CVE design.First Monday.

5. Breindl Y. Theiner P. &Busch A.(2015).Internet blocking regulations: A comparative analysis of 21 liberal democracies.111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco CA.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3