Validity of content‐based techniques for credibility assessment—How telling is an extended meta‐analysis taking research bias into account?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Validity of content‐based techniques for credibility assessment—How telling is an extended meta‐analysis taking research bias into account?

Published:2021-01-11 Issue:2 Volume:35 Page:393-410
ISSN:0888-4080
Container-title:Applied Cognitive Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Appl Cognit Psychol

Author:

Oberlader Verena A.¹^ORCID,Quinten Laura¹^ORCID,Banse Rainer¹^ORCID,Volbert Renate²³^ORCID,Schmidt Alexander F.⁴^ORCID,Schönbrodt Felix D.⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms‐Universität Bonn Bonn Germany

2. Forensic Psychology Psychologische Hochschule Berlin Berlin Germany

3. Institute of Forensic Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany

4. Department of Psychology Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany

5. Department of Psychology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/acp.3776

Reference129 articles.

1. The effects of training professional groups and lay persons to use criteria-based content analysis to detect deception

2. Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations

3. Careful calculation or a leap of faith? A field study of the translation of CBCA ratings to final credibility judgements

4. Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review

5. Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Differences Between True and False Memories Using the Criteria‐Based Content Analysis;Applied Cognitive Psychology;2024-09

2. Facilitating sensitive disclosures by building rapport: the sensitive topic paradigm*;Psychology, Crime & Law;2024-07-24

3. The perils of methods that detect lies 70% of the time: A reply to Ben‐Shakhar and Verschuere (2024);Legal and Criminological Psychology;2024-07-10

4. Virtuelle Szenarien in der Rechtspsychologie;Praxis der Rechtspsychologie;2024-06

5. Finnish district judges' assessments of live versus video‐mediated party statements in court;Scandinavian Journal of Psychology;2024-05-11