Performance of large language models on benign prostatic hyperplasia frequently asked questions

Author:

Zhang YuNing12,Dong Yijie12,Mei Zihan12,Hou Yiqing12,Wei Minyan12ORCID,Yeung Yat Hin12,Xu Jiale12,Hua Qing12,Lai LiMei12,Li Ning3ORCID,Xia ShuJun12,Zhou Chun12,Zhou JianQiao12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

2. College of Health Science and Technology Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

3. Department of Ultrasound, Yunnan Kungang Hospital The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Dali University Anning Yunnan China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition, yet it is challenging for the average BPH patient to find credible and accurate information about BPH. Our goal is to evaluate and compare the accuracy and reproducibility of large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT‐3.5, ChatGPT‐4, and the New Bing Chat in responding to a BPH frequently asked questions (FAQs) questionnaire.MethodsA total of 45 questions related to BPH were categorized into basic and professional knowledge. Three LLM—ChatGPT‐3.5, ChatGPT‐4, and New Bing Chat—were utilized to generate responses to these questions. Responses were graded as comprehensive, correct but inadequate, mixed with incorrect/outdated data, or completely incorrect. Reproducibility was assessed by generating two responses for each question. All responses were reviewed and judged by experienced urologists.ResultsAll three LLMs exhibited high accuracy in generating responses to questions, with accuracy rates ranging from 86.7% to 100%. However, there was no statistically significant difference in response accuracy among the three (p > 0.017 for all comparisons). Additionally, the accuracy of the LLMs' responses to the basic knowledge questions was roughly equivalent to that of the specialized knowledge questions, showing a difference of less than 3.5% (GPT‐3.5: 90% vs. 86.7%; GPT‐4: 96.7% vs. 95.6%; New Bing: 96.7% vs. 93.3%). Furthermore, all three LLMs demonstrated high reproducibility, with rates ranging from 93.3% to 97.8%.ConclusionsChatGPT‐3.5, ChatGPT‐4, and New Bing Chat offer accurate and reproducible responses to BPH‐related questions, establishing them as valuable resources for enhancing health literacy and supporting BPH patients in conjunction with healthcare professionals.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3