Affiliation:
1. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
2. College of Health Science and Technology Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
3. Department of Ultrasound, Yunnan Kungang Hospital The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Dali University Anning Yunnan China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition, yet it is challenging for the average BPH patient to find credible and accurate information about BPH. Our goal is to evaluate and compare the accuracy and reproducibility of large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT‐3.5, ChatGPT‐4, and the New Bing Chat in responding to a BPH frequently asked questions (FAQs) questionnaire.MethodsA total of 45 questions related to BPH were categorized into basic and professional knowledge. Three LLM—ChatGPT‐3.5, ChatGPT‐4, and New Bing Chat—were utilized to generate responses to these questions. Responses were graded as comprehensive, correct but inadequate, mixed with incorrect/outdated data, or completely incorrect. Reproducibility was assessed by generating two responses for each question. All responses were reviewed and judged by experienced urologists.ResultsAll three LLMs exhibited high accuracy in generating responses to questions, with accuracy rates ranging from 86.7% to 100%. However, there was no statistically significant difference in response accuracy among the three (p > 0.017 for all comparisons). Additionally, the accuracy of the LLMs' responses to the basic knowledge questions was roughly equivalent to that of the specialized knowledge questions, showing a difference of less than 3.5% (GPT‐3.5: 90% vs. 86.7%; GPT‐4: 96.7% vs. 95.6%; New Bing: 96.7% vs. 93.3%). Furthermore, all three LLMs demonstrated high reproducibility, with rates ranging from 93.3% to 97.8%.ConclusionsChatGPT‐3.5, ChatGPT‐4, and New Bing Chat offer accurate and reproducible responses to BPH‐related questions, establishing them as valuable resources for enhancing health literacy and supporting BPH patients in conjunction with healthcare professionals.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献