AAPM WGDCAB Report 372: A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report on commissioning of model‐based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy

Author:

Beaulieu Luc12,Ballester Facundo3,Granero Domingo3,Tedgren Åsa Carlsson456,Haworth Annette7,Lowenstein Jessica R.8,Ma Yunzhi12,Mourtada Firas9,Papagiannis Panagiotis10,Rivard Mark J.11,Siebert Frank‐André12,Sloboda Ron S.1314,Smith Ryan L.15,Thomson Rowan M.16,Verhaegen Frank17,Fonseca Gabriel17,Vijande Javier318

Affiliation:

1. Service de Physique Médicale et Radioprotection et Axe Oncologie du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec CHU de Québec—Université Laval Québec Québec Canada

2. Département de Physique de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer Université Laval Québec Québec Canada

3. Departamento de Física Atómica Molecular y Nuclear, IRIMED IIS‐La Fe‐Universitat de Valencia Burjassot Spain

4. Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV) Radiation Physics, Linköping University Linköping Sweden

5. Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

6. Department of Oncology Pathology Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden

7. School of Physics University of Sydney Sydney Australia

8. Department of Radiation Physics UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

9. Department of Radiation Oncology Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

10. Medical Physics Laboratory Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

11. Department of Radiation Oncology Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

12. Clinic of Radiotherapy University Hospital of Schleswig−Holstein, Campus Kiel Kiel Germany

13. Department of Medical Physics Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton Alberta Canada

14. Department of Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

15. Alfred Health Radiation Oncology The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

16. Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada

17. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO) GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands

18. Instituto de Física Corpuscular IFIC (UV‐CSIC) Burjassot Spain

Abstract

AbstractThe introduction of model‐based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) in brachytherapy provides an opportunity for a more accurate dose calculation and opens the possibility for novel, innovative treatment modalities. The joint AAPM, ESTRO, and ABG Task Group 186 (TG‐186) report provided guidance to early adopters. However, the commissioning aspect of these algorithms was described only in general terms with no quantitative goals. This report, from the Working Group on Model‐Based Dose Calculation Algorithms in Brachytherapy, introduced a field‐tested approach to MBDCA commissioning. It is based on a set of well‐characterized test cases for which reference Monte Carlo (MC) and vendor‐specific MBDCA dose distributions are available in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine—Radiotherapy (DICOM‐RT) format to the clinical users. The key elements of the TG‐186 commissioning workflow are now described in detail, and quantitative goals are provided. This approach leverages the well‐known Brachytherapy Source Registry jointly managed by the AAPM and the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston Quality Assurance Center (with associated links at ESTRO) to provide open access to test cases as well as step‐by‐step user guides. While the current report is limited to the two most widely commercially available MBDCAs and only for 192Ir‐based afterloading brachytherapy at this time, this report establishes a general framework that can easily be extended to other brachytherapy MBDCAs and brachytherapy sources. The AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS recommend that clinical medical physicists implement the workflow presented in this report to validate both the basic and the advanced dose calculation features of their commercial MBDCAs. Recommendations are also given to vendors to integrate advanced analysis tools into their brachytherapy treatment planning system to facilitate extensive dose comparisons. The use of the test cases for research and educational purposes is further encouraged.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Swedish Cancer Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3