Detection of doping substances in paired dried blood spots and urine samples collected during doping controls in Danish fitness centers

Abstract

AbstractThe use of dried blood spot (DBS) in anti‐doping can be advantageous in terms of collection, transportation, and storage compared with the traditional anti‐doping testing matrices urine and venous blood. There could, nonetheless, be disadvantages such as shorter detection windows for some substances compared with urine, but real‐life comparison of the detectability of prohibited substances in DBS and urine is lacking. Herein, we present a liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC‐HRMS)‐based screening method for simultaneous detection of 19 target analytes from the doping substance categories S1–S5 in a single spot. Ninety‐eight urine and upper‐arm DBS (Tasso‐M20) sample pairs were collected from fitness centers customers notified for doping control by Anti Doping Denmark, and three sample pairs were collected from active steroid users undergoing clinical evaluation and treatment at a Danish hospital. The analytical findings were cross compared to evaluate the applicability of the developed DBS testing menu in terms of feasibility and analytical performance. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the detectability of prohibited substances in DBS and urine samples collected in a doping control setting. Twenty‐seven of the urine samples and 23 DBS samples were positive, and we observed a very high concordance (95%) in the overall analytical results (i.e., positive or negative samples for both urine and DBS). Collectively, these results are very promising, and DBS seems suitable as a stand‐alone matrix in doping control in fitness centers likely because of the high analyte concentration levels in these samples.