Impact and effectiveness of a mandatory competency‐based simulation program for pediatric emergency medicine faculty

Author:

Pirie Jonathan1ORCID,Fayyaz Jabeen1,Prinicipi Tania1,Kempinska Anna2,Gharib Mireille1,Simone Laura1ORCID,Glanfield Carrie1,Walsh Catharine M3

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre Children's Hospital of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada

3. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the Research and Learning Institutes The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPediatric emergency medicine physicians struggle to maintain their critical procedural and resuscitation skills. Continuing professional development programs incorporating simulation and competency‐based standards may help ensure skill maintenance. Using a logic model framework, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a mandatory annual competency‐based medical education (CBME) simulation program.MethodsThe CBME program, evaluated from 2016 to 2018, targeted procedural, point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) and resuscitation skills. Delivery of educational content included a flipped‐classroom website, deliberate practice, mastery‐based learning, and stop‐pause debriefing. Participants' competence was assessed using a 5‐point global rating scale (GRS; 3 = competent, 5 = mastery). Statistical process control charts were used to measure the effect of the CBME program on team performance during in situ simulations (ISS), measured using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) scale. Faculty completed an online program evaluation survey.ResultsForty physicians and 48 registered nurses completed at least one course over 3 years (physician mean ± SD 2.2 ± 0.92). Physicians achieved competence on 430 of 442 stations (97.3%). Mean ± SD GRS scores for procedural, POCUS, and resuscitation stations were 4.34 ± 0.43, 3.96 ± 0.35, and 4.17 ± 0.27, respectively. ISS TEAM scores for “followed standards and guidelines” improved significantly. No signals of special cause variation emerged for the other 11 TEAM items, indicating skills maintenance. Physicians rated CBME training as highly valuable (mean question scores 4.15–4.85/5). Time commitment and scheduling were identified as barriers to participation.ConclusionsOur mandatory simulation‐based CBME program had high completion rates and very low station failures. The program was highly rated and faculty improved or maintained their ISS performance across TEAM scale domains.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Education,Emergency Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3