Measured task load in directed observers versus active participants undergoing high‐fidelity simulation education in a critical care setting

Author:

Devlin‐Hegedus Jessica123,Miller Matthew456ORCID,Cooke Sean4,Ware Sandra4,Richmond Clare4

Affiliation:

1. Wollongong Hospital Wollongong New South Wales Australia

2. NSW Ambulance Rozelle New South Wales Australia

3. Graduate School of Medicine University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

4. NSW Ambulance Aeromedical Operations Bankstown New South Wales Australia

5. St George Hospital Kogarah New South Wales Australia

6. St George and Sutherland Clinical Campus UNSW Sydney Kogarah New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe use of directed observers in high‐fidelity simulation education is increasingly common. While evidence suggests similar educational outcomes for directed observers compared to active participants in technical skills, it remains uncertain if this benefit also exists for senior clinicians, especially in mental workload. We sought to compare the workload between active participants and directed observers using an objective measure.MethodsWe performed a prospective, repeated‐measures observational study during the New South Wales Ambulance Aeromedical Operations induction training from 2019 to 2020. Participants included senior critical care doctors, paramedics, and nurses undergoing high‐fidelity simulation of prehospital and interhospital aeromedical missions. Task load was measured using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index (NASA‐TLX) administered following each simulation debrief. Prehospital and interhospital simulations were compared separately by building a multilevel model for complete case and all study data. Post hoc comparisons of NASA‐TLX score for each group were performed using estimated marginal means (EMMs).ResultsWe enrolled 70 participants, comprising 49 physicians (70%), 19 paramedics (27%), and two flight nurses (3%). From the complete case analysis, statistically significant differences were observed for total NASA‐TLX scores between active participants and directed observers in both prehospital (participant EMM 78, observer EMM 65, estimated difference −13, 95% confidence interval [CI] −20 to −7) and interhospital simulations (participant EMM 69, observer EMM 59, estimated difference −10, 95% CI −16 to −3). When all available data were included, the pattern of results did not change.ConclusionsIn our sample of senior clinicians, the task load experienced by both active participants and directed observers in high‐fidelity simulation education was high for both prehospital and interhospital simulation exercises. The statistically significant differences we report are unlikely to be practically significant. Our results support the use of directed observers when resource limitations do not allow all course attendees to participate in every simulation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Education,Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3