Reconceptualizing the emergency medicine resident scholarly requirement: Proposed framework and rubric

Author:

Pillow M. Tyson1ORCID,Gottlieb Michael2ORCID,Messman Anne3ORCID,Hartman Nicholas D.4ORCID,Tsyrulnik Alina5ORCID,Barnes David6,Lall Michelle D.7ORCID,Sule Harsh8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

2. Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA

3. Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA

4. Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

5. Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

6. University of California Davis School of Medicine Sacramento California USA

7. Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA

8. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe completion of a scholarly project is a common program requirement by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for all residency training programs. However, the implementation can vary significantly between programs. Lack of generalizable standards for scholarly projects required of all trainees within ACGME‐accredited residencies has led to a large range of quality and effort put forth to complete these projects. Our goal is to introduce a framework and propose a corresponding rubric for application to resident scholarship to quantify and qualify the components of scholarship to better measure resident scholarly output across the graduate medical education (GME) continuum.MethodsEight experienced educators and members of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Education Committee were selected to explore the current scholarly project guidelines and propose a definition that can be universally applied to diverse training programs. Following a review of the current literature, the authors engaged in iterative, divergent, and convergent discussions via meetings and asynchronous dialogue to develop a framework and associated rubric.ResultsThe group proposes that emergency medicine (EM) resident scholarship should (1) involve a structured process, (2) generate outcomes, (3) be disseminated, and (4) be peer reviewed. These components of resident scholarly activity are achieved whether this is a single project encompassing all four domains, or multiple smaller projects that sum to the whole. To assist residency programs in assessing a given individual resident's achievement of the standards set forth, a rubric is proposed.ConclusionBased on current literature and consensus, we propose a framework and rubric for tracking of resident scholarly project achievement in an effort to elevate and advance EM scholarship. Future work should explore the optimal application of this framework and define minimal scholarship goals for EM resident scholarship.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Education,Emergency Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. ACGME Common Program Requirements (Residency).Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).2021:25–28. Accessed on September 9 2022.https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresidency_2022v3.pdf

2. BoyerEL.Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.1990.

3. www.acgme.org(Accessed on March 20 2022).

4. Conceptual review papers: revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3