Affiliation:
1. School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane Queensland Australia
2. Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital–Raymond Terrace Metro South Health Service South Brisbane Queensland Australia
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionThis retrospective planning study aimed to evaluate the role of bolus in achieving dose uniformity in the ankles and feet in paediatric patients undergoing Modulated Arc Total Body Irradiation (MATBI) treatment and to identify patient factors that may negate or warrant its use.MethodsThe clinically treated plans of 20 paediatric patients who received MATBI treatment utilising ankle and foot bolus (Bolus plan) were compared with two retrospectively generated plans; a plan with bolus removed and no re‐optimisation (No Bolus plan), and a re‐optimised plan without bolus attempting to achieve equal dosimetry to the clinical plan via monitor unit adjustment (MU plan). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the dose uniformity criteria of ±10% coverage of the reference dose (RD) for each subregion of the ankle and foot for the three plans. The impact of patient height, weight, and age at the time of treatment was evaluated using Spearman's correlation.ResultsVariation in doses >10% RD was minimal across the three plans, with an average D1cc difference < 0.4Gy. For the ankle and foot regions in the Bolus plans, the volume receiving at least 90% of the RD (V90) was on average > 92%. In No Bolus and MU plans, there was an average reduction of 24.5% and 23.2% V90 coverage respectively in the toes. Spearman's correlation suggests height has the strongest relationship to D1cc.ConclusionThis study validated the continued use of ankle and foot bolus to achieve dosimetric goals for paediatric MATBI treatments, particularly V90 coverage across all heights.
Reference13 articles.
1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Cancer Incidence by Age. In: Government A editor. Cancer data in Australia 2022.
2. Towards homogenization of total body irradiation practices in pediatric patients across SIOPE affiliated centers. A survey by the SIOPE radiation oncology working group
3. Total Body Irradiation for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: What Can We Agree on?
4. Van DykJ GalvinJ GlasgowG PodgoršakEB CommitteeART.The physical aspects of total and half body photon irradiation: A report of Task Group 29 Radiation therapy committee association of physicists in medicine: American association of of physicists in medicine.1986.
5. Total Body Irradiation: Guidelines from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG)