Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine
2. Internal Medicine Department LAUTECH Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso Nigeria
3. School of Medicine University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
4. Faculty of Medicine University of St Andrews St. Andrews Scotland UK
5. School of Medicine Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
6. Faculty of Clinical Sciences University of Ilorin Ilorin Nigeria
7. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland
8. Faculty of Biology, Medicineand Health The University of Manchester Manchester UK
9. Department of Neurosurgery Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is transforming oncology and surgery by improving diagnostics, personalizing treatments, and enhancing surgical precision. Patients appreciate AI for its potential to provide accurate prognoses and tailored therapies. However, AI's implementation raises ethical concerns, data privacy issues, and the need for transparent communication between patients and health care providers. This study aims to understand patients' perspectives on AI integration in oncology and surgery to foster a balanced and patient‐centered approach.MethodsThe study utilized a comprehensive literature review and analysis of existing research on AI applications in oncology and surgery. The focus was on examining patient perceptions, ethical considerations, and the potential benefits and risks associated with AI integration. Data was collected from peer‐reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and expert opinions to provide a broad understanding of the topic. The perspectives of patients was also emphasized to highlight the nuances of their acceptance and concerns regarding AI in their health care.ResultsPatients generally perceive AI in oncology and surgery as beneficial, appreciating its potential for more accurate diagnoses, personalized treatment plans, and improved surgical outcomes. They particularly value AI's role in providing timely and precise diagnostics, which can lead to better prognoses and reduced anxiety. However, concerns about data privacy, ethical implications, and the reliability of AI systems were prevalent. Consequently, trust in AI and health care providers was deemed as a crucial factor for patient acceptance. Additionally, the need for transparent communication and ethical safeguards was also highlighted to address these concerns effectively.ConclusionThe integration of AI in oncology and surgeryholds significant promise for enhancing patient care and outcomes. Patients view AI as a valuable tool that can provide accurate prognoses and personalized treatments. However, addressing ethical concerns, ensuring data privacy, and building trust through transparent communication are essential for successful AI integration. Future initiatives should focus on refining AI algorithms, establishing robust ethical guidelines, and enhancing patient education to harmonize technological advancements with patient‐centered care principles.