Affiliation:
1. The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education Yangling Shaanxi China
2. School of Ecological Engineering Guizhou University of Engineering Science Bijie Guizhou China
3. Institute of Eco‐environmental and Soil Sciences Guangdong Academy of Sciences China
4. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University Yangling Shaanxi China
5. School of Geographical Sciences China West Normal University Nanchong China
6. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Beijing China
7. Chayu water Conservancy Bureau Nyingchi China
Abstract
AbstractSoil loss is a common land degradation process worldwide, which is impacted by land use and climate change. In this study, random forests (RF) were first used to establish a soil loss model at the scale of a small watershed in the hilly‐gully region of the Loess Plateau based on the field observation data. Subsequently, the model was used to predict soil loss in the Chabagou watershed under the historical (1990–2020) and future emission scenarios, namely SSP1–2.6 (low‐emission), SSP2–4.5 (medium‐emission) and SSP5–8.5 (high‐emission) (2030–2,100) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 6 (CMIP6). In the RF model, the coefficient of determination (R2) and Nash‐Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NS) were both greater than 0.86, and the RMSE‐observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) was less than 0.36. Additionally, the RF‐based model had higher simulation accuracy and robustness than those of the previous soil loss models, indicating its potential for wider applications in simulating soil loss. Compared with soil loss between 1990 and 1999, climate change led to a 35.36% increase in soil loss, while land use change resulted in an 11.13% reduction from 2000 to 2020 in the Chabagou watershed. This reveals that the current land use management could not effectively counterbalance the soil loss caused by rainstorms. Furthermore, compared with the historical period (1990–2020), under SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 (2030–2,100), the soil loss rates without land use change would be increased by 6.01%, 19.11% and 35.35%, while the soil loss rates with land use change would be changed by −5.88%, +4.41% and +19.12%, respectively. These results help to provide a scientific basis for enhancing the capacity to respond to climate change and mitigation of soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China