Predicting soil loss in small watersheds under different emission scenarios from CMIP6 using random forests

Author:

Chen Yulan12,Wang Nan13,Jiao Juying14ORCID,Li Jianjun4ORCID,Bai Leichao45,Liang Yue6,Wei Yanhong1,Zhang Ziqi4,Xu Qian4,Zhang Zhixin47,Wang Jiaxi14

Affiliation:

1. The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education Yangling Shaanxi China

2. School of Ecological Engineering Guizhou University of Engineering Science Bijie Guizhou China

3. Institute of Eco‐environmental and Soil Sciences Guangdong Academy of Sciences China

4. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University Yangling Shaanxi China

5. School of Geographical Sciences China West Normal University Nanchong China

6. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Beijing China

7. Chayu water Conservancy Bureau Nyingchi China

Abstract

AbstractSoil loss is a common land degradation process worldwide, which is impacted by land use and climate change. In this study, random forests (RF) were first used to establish a soil loss model at the scale of a small watershed in the hilly‐gully region of the Loess Plateau based on the field observation data. Subsequently, the model was used to predict soil loss in the Chabagou watershed under the historical (1990–2020) and future emission scenarios, namely SSP1–2.6 (low‐emission), SSP2–4.5 (medium‐emission) and SSP5–8.5 (high‐emission) (2030–2,100) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 6 (CMIP6). In the RF model, the coefficient of determination (R2) and Nash‐Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NS) were both greater than 0.86, and the RMSE‐observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) was less than 0.36. Additionally, the RF‐based model had higher simulation accuracy and robustness than those of the previous soil loss models, indicating its potential for wider applications in simulating soil loss. Compared with soil loss between 1990 and 1999, climate change led to a 35.36% increase in soil loss, while land use change resulted in an 11.13% reduction from 2000 to 2020 in the Chabagou watershed. This reveals that the current land use management could not effectively counterbalance the soil loss caused by rainstorms. Furthermore, compared with the historical period (1990–2020), under SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 (2030–2,100), the soil loss rates without land use change would be increased by 6.01%, 19.11% and 35.35%, while the soil loss rates with land use change would be changed by −5.88%, +4.41% and +19.12%, respectively. These results help to provide a scientific basis for enhancing the capacity to respond to climate change and mitigation of soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3