Modeling the impact of tissue oxygen profiles and oxygen depletion parameter uncertainties on biological response and therapeutic benefit of FLASH

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundUltra‐high dose rate (FLASH) radiation has been reported to efficiently suppress tumor growth while sparing normal tissue; however, the mechanism of the differential tissue sparing effect is still not known. Oxygen has long been known to profoundly impact radiobiological responses, and radiolytic oxygen depletion has been considered to be a possible cause or contributor to the FLASH phenomenon.PurposeThis work investigates the impact of tissue pO2 profiles, oxygen depletion per unit dose (g), and the oxygen concentration yielding half‐maximum radiosensitization (the average of its maximum value and one) (k) in tumor and normal tissue.MethodsWe developed a model that considers the dependent relationship between oxygen depletion and change of radiosensitivity by FLASH irradiation. The model assumed that FLASH irradiation depletes intracellular oxygen more rapidly than it diffuses into the cell from the extracellular environment. Cell survival was calculated based on the linear quadratic‐linear model and the radiosensitivity related parameters were adjusted in 1 Gy increments of the administered dose. The model reproduced published experimental data that were obtained with different cell lines and oxygen concentrations, and was used to analyze the impact of parameter uncertainties on the radiobiological responses. This study expands the oxygen depletion analysis of FLASH to normal human tissue and tumor based on clinically determined aggregate and individual patient pO2 profiles.ResultsThe results show that the pO2 profile is the most essential factor that affects biological response and analyses based on the median pO2 rather than the full pO2 profile can be unreliable and misleading. Additionally, the presence of a small fraction of cells on the threshold of radiobiologic hypoxia substantially alters biological response due to FLASH oxygen depletion. We found that an increment in the k value is generally more protective of tumor than normal tissue due to a higher frequency of lower pO2 values in tumors. Variation in the g value affects the dose at which oxygen depletion impacts response, but does not alter the dose‐dependent response trends, if the g value is identical in both tumor and normal tissue.ConclusionsThe therapeutic efficacy of FLASH oxygen depletion is likely patient and tissue‐dependent. For breast cancer, FLASH is beneficial in a minority of cases; however, in a subset of well oxygenated tumors, a therapeutic gain may be realized due to induced normal tissue hypoxia.