Prevalence and anatomical factors associated with stent under‐expansion in non‐severely calcified lesions

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundStent underexpansion, typically related to lesion calcification, is the strongest predictor of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although uncommon, underexpansion may also occur in non‐severely calcified lesions.AimWe sought to identify the prevalence and anatomical characteristics of underexpansion in non‐severely calcified lesions.MethodsWe included 993 patients who underwent optical coherence tomography‐guided PCI of 1051 de novo lesions with maximum calcium arc <180°. Negative remodeling (NR) was the smallest lesion site external elastic lamina diameter that was also smaller than the distal reference. Stent expansion was evaluated using a linear regression model accounting for vessel tapering; underexpansion required both stent expansion <70% and stent area <4.5mm2.ResultsUnderexpansion was observed in 3.6% of non‐heavily calcified lesions (38/1051). Pre‐stent maximum calcium arc and thickness were greater in lesions with versus without underexpansion (median 119° vs. 85°, p = 0.002; median 0.95 mm vs. 0.78 mm, p = 0.008). NR was also more common in lesions with underexpansion (44.7% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.007). In the multivariable logistic regression model, larger and thicker eccentric calcium, mid left anterior descending artery (LAD) location, and NR were associated with underexpansion in non‐severely calcified lesions. The rate of underexpansion was especially high (30.7%) in lesions exhibiting all three morphologies. Two‐year TLF tended to be higher in underexpanded versus non‐underexpanded stents (9.7% vs. 3.7%, unadjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 3.02 [0.92, 9.58], p = 0.06).ConclusionAlthough underexpansion in the absence of severe calcium (<180°) is uncommon, mid‐LAD lesions with NR and large and thick eccentric calcium were associated with underexpansion.