Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
Abstract
AbstractDominant stories about public intellectualism tend to erase academics of racially minoritized and marginalized backgrounds as well as academics appointed outside of research universities. This chapter makes sense of these erasures and considers their associated costs by applying the lenses of critical race theory (CRT) and epistemic injustice. Ultimately, this chapter attempts to broaden the academy's view about public intellectualism, making visible the work that so many have been doing for so long which includes fierce acts of advocacy and community uplift.
Reference35 articles.
1. Acosta G.(2016).The invisible Latina intellectual. Retrieved fromhttps://www.vidaweb.org/the‐invisible‐latina‐intellectual/
2. Educating Our Own: The Historical Legacy of HBCUs and Their Relevance for Educating a New Generation of Leaders
3. Behm N. Rankins‐Robertson S. &Roen D.(2014).The case for academics as public intellectuals. Retrieved fromhttps://www.aaup.org/article/case‐academics‐public‐intellectuals#YuiDEuzMIuG
4. Bensimon E.(2018).Bridging the artificial gap between activism and scholarshipInLaura W.Perna(Ed.) Taking it to the streets: The role of scholarship in advocacy and advocacy in scholarship.Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献