Author:
Wright Eryn,Pagliaro Claudia,Page Imogen S.,Diminic Sandra
Abstract
Abstract
National mental health surveys play a critical role in determining the prevalence of mental disorders in a population and informing service planning. However, current surveys have important limitations, including the exclusion of key vulnerable groups and increasing rates of non-response. This review aims to synthesise information on excluded and undersampled groups in national mental health surveys. We conducted a targeted review of nationally representative adult mental health surveys performed between 2005 and 2019 in high-income OECD countries. Sixteen surveys met our inclusion criteria. The response rate for included surveys ranged between 36.3% and 80.0%. The most frequently excluded groups included people who were homeless, people in hospitals or health facilities and people in correctional facilities. Males and young people were the most commonly underrepresented groups among respondents. Attempts to collect data from non-responders and excluded populations were limited, but suggest that mental health status differs among some of these cohorts. The exclusion of key vulnerable groups and high rates of non-response have important implications for interpreting and using the results of national mental health surveys. Targeted supplementary surveys of excluded or hard-to-reach populations, more inclusive sampling methodologies, and strategies aimed at improving response rates should be considered to strengthen the accuracy and usefulness of survey findings.
Funder
The University of Queensland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology
Reference107 articles.
1. Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Chatterji S, Lee S, Ustün TB (2009) The WHO world mental health (WMH) surveys. Psychiatrie (Stuttg) 6(1):5–9
2. Weinberg L, Whiteford H, de Almeida JC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Levinson D, O’Neill S, Kovess-Masfety V (2012) Translation of the world mental health survey data to policies: an exploratory study of Stakeholders’ perceptions of how epidemiologic data can be utilized for policy in the field of mental health. Public Health Rev 34(2):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391672
3. Chisholm D, Heslin M, Docrat S, Nanda S, Shidhaye R, Upadhaya N, Jordans M, Abdulmalik J, Olayiwola S, Gureje O, Kizza D, Mugisha J, Kigozi F, Hanlon C, Adugna M, Sanders R, Pretorius C, Thornicroft G, Lund C (2017) Scaling-up services for psychosis, depression and epilepsy in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: development and application of a mental health systems planning tool (OneHealth). Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 26(3):234–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016000408
4. Diminic S, Page I, Gossip K, Comben C, Wright E, Pagliaro C, John J (2022) Technical Appendices for the Introduction to the National Mental Health Service Planning Framework – Commissioned by the Australian Government Department of Health. Version AUS V4.1. The University of Queensland, Brisbane
5. Wright E, Leitch E, Fjeldsoe K, Diminic S, Gossip K, Hudson P, Whiteford H (2021) Using the national mental health service planning framework to support an integrated approach to regional mental health planning in Queensland. Australia Aust J Primary Health 27(2):109–115
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献