An empirical comparison of three methods for multiple cutoff diagnostic test meta‐analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 ( PHQ ‐9) depression screening tool using published data vs individual level data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An empirical comparison of three methods for multiple cutoff diagnostic test meta‐analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 ( PHQ ‐9) depression screening tool using published data vs individual level data

Published:2020-09-13 Issue:6 Volume:11 Page:833-848
ISSN:1759-2879
Container-title:Research Synthesis Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Res Syn Meth

Author:

Benedetti Andrea¹²^ORCID,Levis Brooke¹³,Rücker Gerta⁴^ORCID,Jones Hayley E.⁵,Schumacher Martin⁴,Ioannidis John P. A.⁶,Thombs Brett³,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health McGill University Canada

2. Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation McGill University Health Centre Canada

3. Lady Davis Research Institute, SMBD Jewish General Hospital Canada

4. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center ‐ University of Freiburg Germany

5. Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol UK

6. Meta‐Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), and Departments of Medicine Health Research and Policy, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics, Stanford University Stanford California USA

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé

Institute of Health Services and Policy Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jrsm.1443

Reference30 articles.