A discrete time‐to‐event model for the meta‐analysis of full ROC curves

Author:

Stoye Ferdinand Valentin1ORCID,Tschammler Claudia1,Kuss Oliver2ORCID,Hoyer Annika1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Biostatistics and Medical Biometry Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University Bielefeld Germany

2. Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

Abstract

AbstractThe development of new statistical models for the meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies is still an ongoing field of research, especially with respect to summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In the recently published updated version of the “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy”, the authors point to the challenges of this kind of meta‐analysis and propose two approaches. However, both of them come with some disadvantages, such as the nonstraightforward choice of priors in Bayesian models or the requirement of a two‐step approach where parameters are estimated for the individual studies, followed by summarizing the results. As an alternative, we propose a novel model by applying methods from time‐to‐event analysis. To this task we use the discrete proportional hazard approach to treat the different diagnostic thresholds, that provide means to estimate sensitivity and specificity and are reported by the single studies, as categorical variables in a generalized linear mixed model, using both the logit‐ and the asymmetric cloglog‐link. This leads to a model specification with threshold‐specific discrete hazards, avoiding a linear dependency between thresholds, discrete hazard, and sensitivity/specificity and thus increasing model flexibility. We compare the resulting models to approaches from the literature in a simulation study. While the estimated area under the summary ROC curve is estimated comparably well in most approaches, the results depict substantial differences in the estimated sensitivities and specificities. We also show the practical applicability of the models to data from a meta‐analysis for the screening of type 2 diabetes.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3