Medical interpreter‐mediated genetic counseling for Spanish preferring adults at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome

Author:

Joseph Galen1ORCID,Lindberg Nangel M.2,Guerra Claudia1,Hernandez Cindy34,Karliner Leah S.5ORCID,Gilmore Marian J.6,Zepp Jamilyn6,Rolf Bradley A.7,Caruncho Mikaella8,Riddle Leslie1,Kauffman Tia L.2,Leo Michael C.2,Wilfond Benjamin S.9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA

2. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Portland Oregon USA

3. Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA

4. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Houston Texas USA

5. Department of General Internal Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA

6. Department of Translational and Applied Genomics Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Portland Oregon USA

7. Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USA

8. Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics Columbia University New York New York USA

9. Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this study was to identify interpretation challenges specific to exome sequencing and errors of potential clinical significance in the context of genetic counseling for adults at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome. Thirty transcripts of interpreter‐mediated telephone results disclosure genetic counseling appointments were coded for errors by bilingual researchers, and the coders applied an overall rating to denote the degree to which the errors interfered with communication overall. Genetic counselors reviewed a subset of errors flagged for potential clinical significance to identify those likely to have clinical impact. Qualitative interviews with 19 interpreters were analyzed to elucidate the challenges they face in interpreting for genetic counseling appointments. Our analysis identified common interpretation errors such as raising the register, omissions, and additions. Further, we found errors specific to genetic counseling concepts and content that appeared to impact the ability of the genetic counselor to accurately assess risk. These errors also may have impacted the patient's ability to understand their results, access appropriate follow‐up care, and communicate with family members. Among interpreters' strengths was the use of requests for clarification; in fact, even more use of clarification would have been beneficial in these encounters. Qualitative interviews surfaced challenges stemming from the structure of interpreter work, such as switching from medical and nonmedical interpretations without substantial breaks. Importantly, while errors were frequent, most did not impede communication overall, and most were not likely to impact clinical care. Nevertheless, potentially clinically impactful errors in communication of genetics concepts may contribute to inequitable care for limited English proficient patients and suggest that additional training in genetics and specialization in healthcare may be warranted. In addition, training for genetic counselors and guidance for patients in working effectively with interpreters could enhance interpreters' transmission of complex genetic concepts.

Funder

National Human Genome Research Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference53 articles.

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019).2018 National Healthcare Quality and disparities report.https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr18/index.html

2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2020).AHRQ health literacy universal precautions toolkit.https://www.ahrq.gov/health‐literacy/improve/precautions/index.html

3. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations

4. Laboratory-related outcomes from integrating an accessible delivery model for hereditary cancer risk assessment and genetic testing in populations with barriers to access

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3