Comparison of the Antibacterial Activity of Selected Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Deep Eutectic Solvents Comprising Organic Acids (OA‐DESs) Toward Gram‐Positive and Gram‐Negative Species

Author:

Swebocki Tomasz1ORCID,Kocot Aleksandra M.2ORCID,Barras Alexandre1ORCID,Arellano Helena3ORCID,Bonnaud Leila4,Haddadi Kamel1ORCID,Fameau Anne‐Laure3,Szunerits Sabine1,Plotka Magdalena2ORCID,Boukherroub Rabah1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Université de Lille CNRS Université Polytechnique Hauts‐de‐France UMR 8520 – IEMN – Institut d'Electronique de Microélectronique et de Nanotechnologie Lille 59000 France

2. Laboratory of Extremophiles Biology, Department of Microbiology Faculty of Biology University of Gdańsk Wita Stwosza 59 Gdańsk 80—308 Poland

3. Université de Lille CNRS INRAe UMR 8207 – UMET – Unité Matériaux et Transformations Centrale Lille Lille 59000 France

4. Laboratory of Polymeric and Composite Materials Materia Nova Innovation Center in Materials of the University of Mons 3 Avenue Nicolas Copernic Mons B‐7000 Belgium

Abstract

AbstractDeep eutectic solvents (DESs) have been intensively investigated in recent years for their antibacterial properties, with DESs that comprise organic acids (OA‐DESs) showing promising antibacterial action. However a majority of the reports focused only on a limited number strains and techniques, which is not enough to determine the antibacterial potential of a substance. To bridge this gap, the antibacterial activity of classical DESs and OA‐DESs is assessed on twelve Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria strains, with some of them exhibiting specific resistance toward antibiotics. The investigated formulations of OA‐DESs comprise glycolic, malic, malonic, and oxalic acids as representatives of this group. Using a range of microbiological assays as well as physicochemical characterization methods, a major difference of the effectiveness between the two groups is demonstrated, with OA‐DESs exhibiting, as expected, greater antibacterial effectiveness than classical DESs. Most interestingly, slight differences in the minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentration values as well as time‐kill kinetics profiles are observed between Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative strains. Transmission electron microscopy analysis reveals the effect of the treatment of the bacteria with the representatives of both groups of DESs, which allows us to better understand the possible mechanism‐of‐action of these novel materials.

Funder

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3