Affiliation:
1. Department of Teacher Education, College of Education Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
2. Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, School of Education University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
3. Department of Educational Leadership and Policy, College of Education University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractAccess to computer science education (CSEd) has greatly expanded in recent years. Starting with the Computer Science for All Initiative, launched in 2016 under President Obama, CSEd has expanded across the U.S. with over half of high schools offering at least one computer science course. Although there has been growth in computer science course offerings, disparities exist when it comes to ‘who’ enrolls in CSEd courses, and ‘where’ those courses are being offered. These disparities highlight that while funding and support for CSEd has increased, little is known about the capacity of states to operationalize (and implement) policies to achieve equitable CSEd. Furthermore, how recent changes at the federal and state level(s) are directly impacting minoritized populations' access, participation, and engagement in CSEd. This commentary focuses on the state‐level capacity to implement equity‐focused CSEd policies that can lead to improvements in student opportunities and outcomes. We argue that state CSEd leaders engage at the intersection of four areas: (1) growing state investment in CSEd, (2) increasingly polarizing political environments, (3) securing human and fiscal resources to implement CSEd policy with fidelity, and (4) supporting Culturally Responsive Computing that sustains equitable teaching and learning practices in schools and classrooms. This commentary also serves as a Call to Action for STEM education researchers to listen closely and carefully to the communities served by CSEd research, including students, families, and educators.
Reference26 articles.
1. Equity in high school computer science: Beyond access
2. Code.org Computer Science Teachers Association &Expanding Computing Education Pathways Alliance. (2022).2022 state of computer science education: Understanding our national imperative. Retrieved fromhttps://advocacy.code.org/2022_state_of_cs.pdf
3. Flannery M.(2024).Anti‐DEI bans take aim at students of color and LGBTQ+ students. National Education Association.https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/anti-dei-laws-take-aim-students-color-and-lgbtq-students
4. CAPE