Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions

Author:

Charoenkwan Kittipat1,Iheozor-Ejiofor Zipporah2,Rerkasem Kittipan3,Matovinovic Elizabeth4

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 110 Intawaroros Road Chiang Mai Thailand 50200

2. The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health; Jean McFarlane Building Oxford Road Manchester UK M13 9PL

3. Chiang Mai University; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine; Chiang Mai Thailand

4. Chiang Mai University; Faculty of Medicine; Chiang Mai Thailand

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference52 articles.

1. Electrocautery effects in infection rates of operative abdominal wounds;Argerich;Jornal Brasileiro de Medicina,2005

2. Electrosurgical skin incision versus conventional scalpel: a prospective trial;Dixon;Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh,1990

3. Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incision in women undergoing repeated cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial;Elbohoty;Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research,2015

4. Do different abdominal incision techniques play a role in wound complications in patients operated on for gastrointestinal malignancies? "Scalpel vs. electrocautery";Eren;Acta Chirurgica Belgica,2010

5. Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates;Groot;American Journal of Surgery,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3