Affiliation:
1. Children's Specialized Hospital–Rutgers University Center for Autism Research, Education, and Services (CSH–RUCARES) Somerset New Jersey USA
2. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick New Jersey USA
3. Upstate Caring Partners Utica New York USA
4. SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA
Abstract
AbstractResearchers have investigated several schedule‐thinning approaches during functional communication training (FCT), including FCT with delay schedules (Delay FCT), FCT with discriminative stimuli (Signaled FCT), and FCT with delay‐and‐denial tolerance training (DDTT). Despite many publications on these approaches, it is unclear how regularly, how often, and under what conditions behavior analysts use these FCT thinning strategies. We analyzed survey data from 129 board‐certified behavior analysts® to determine (a) how often they use the three thinning approaches during FCT, (b) their most preferred thinning method, and (c) the variables (e.g., years of experience, treatment setting) associated with their most used and preferred approaches. DDTT was the most commonly implemented and preferred FCT thinning strategy. Relative to DDTT, Signaled FCT was more frequently used and preferred by doctoral‐level behavior analysts and those working in clinical settings. However, regardless of approach, behavior analysts reported several challenges that hold implications for practice and research.
Reference64 articles.
1. Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020).Ethics code for behavior analysts.https://bacb.com/wp‐content/ethics‐code‐for‐behavior‐analysts/
2. Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2023).Mass email service.https://www.bacb.com/mass‐email‐information/
3. A COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF SCHEDULE THINNING DURING FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING
4. It’s time to close the research to practice gap in autism: The need for implementation science
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献