Exploring dental faculty perceptions of current strategies and barriers to retention

Author:

Tassabehji Nadine M.1,Leach Elena Riccio2,Duffy Rachel L.3,Bay Curt4,Hill Brittaney J.5,Shaw Holly K.6,Stephens Nadejda Stefanova7,Howe Brian J.8,Kowolik Joan E.9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Comprehensive Care Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Comprehensive Dentistry UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry San Antonio Texas USA

3. Comprehensive Care Unit, AT Still University Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health Mesa Arizona USA

4. Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, AT Still University Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health Mesa Arizona USA

5. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry University of Illinois Chicago Illinois USA

6. Department of Operative Dentistry Columbia University College of Dental Medicine New York New York USA

7. Eastman Institute for Oral Health University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Rochester New York USA

8. Department of Family Dentistry University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA

9. Department of Pediatric Dentistry Indiana University School of Dentistry Indianapolis Indiana USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe aims of the study were to identify perceived strategies for and barriers to faculty retention and examine differences regarding age, gender, and race.MethodsCross‐sectional data was captured from the eight author‐affiliated dental schools. A Qualtrics survey was emailed to all faculty members at these institutions (1467 possible participants) between November 2021 and February 2022. The survey was formulated from best practices listed in the American Dental Education Association Faculty Diversity Toolkit. It consisted of 18 questions, including demographic information and faculty perceptions of their respective workplaces. These responses were then evaluated with descriptive statistics, Chi‐squared analysis, Pearson Correlation, and Fleiss’ kappa.ResultsThe survey's response rate was 19.2%. There was no significant difference in perceived retention strategies across race, age, gender, practice tenure, practice type, or clinical versus tenure track. The top four barriers identified were inadequate financial compensation, workload, poor work environment, and burnout. There was a significant difference between racial groups and their perceived barrier of support for promotion (p = 0.048). This was more prevalent among clinical faculty (47.7%) than tenure track faculty (16.2%). The work environment was listed as a leading factor for both promoting retention and encouraging the exodus of faculty members.ConclusionStrategies aimed at improving financial compensation, career recognition, and transparency of the promotion process, along with those aimed at improving the work environment were shown to be vital to retaining faculty. Though the low response rate is a study limitation, these findings provide valuable information and a framework for future studies regarding dental faculty recruitment and retention.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3