Pathological Validation of the MDS Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy

Author:

Virameteekul Sasivimol12,Revesz Tamas1,Jaunmuktane Zane1,Warner Thomas T.12ORCID,De Pablo‐Fernández Eduardo12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London United Kingdom

2. Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London United Kingdom

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe recent International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society diagnostic criteria for multiple system atrophy (MDS‐MSA) have been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy although their diagnostic properties have not been evaluated.ObjectivesThe aims were to validate the MDS‐MSA diagnostic criteria against neuropathological diagnosis and compare their diagnostic performance to previous criteria and diagnosis in clinical practice.MethodsConsecutive patients with sporadic, progressive, adult‐onset parkinsonism, or cerebellar ataxia from the Queen Square Brain Bank between 2009 and 2019 were selected and divided based on neuropathological diagnosis into MSA and non‐MSA. Medical records were systematically reviewed, and clinical diagnosis was documented by retrospectively applying the MDS‐MSA criteria, second consensus criteria, and diagnosis according to treating clinicians at early (within 3 years of symptom onset) and final stages. Diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, and accuracy) were calculated using neuropathological diagnosis as gold standard and compared between different criteria.ResultsThree hundred eighteen patients (103 MSA and 215 non‐MSA) were included, comprising 248 patients with parkinsonism and 70 with cerebellar ataxia. Clinically probable MDS‐MSA showed excellent sensitivity (95.1%), specificity (94.0%), and accuracy (94.3%), although their sensitivity at early stages was modest (62.1%). Clinically probable MDS‐MSA outperformed diagnosis by clinicians and by second consensus criteria. Clinically established MDS‐MSA showed perfect specificity (100%) even at early stages although to the detriment of low sensitivity. MDS‐MSA diagnostic accuracy did not differ according to clinical presentation (ataxia vs. parkinsonism).ConclusionsMDS‐MSA criteria demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance against neuropathological diagnosis and are useful diagnostic tools for clinical practice and research. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3