Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries

Author:

Wasserman D.ORCID,Apter G.ORCID,Baeken C.ORCID,Bailey S.,Balazs J.ORCID,Bec C.ORCID,Bienkowski P.ORCID,Bobes J.ORCID,Ortiz M. F. BravoORCID,Brunn H.ORCID,Bôke Ö.ORCID,Camilleri N.ORCID,Carpiniello B.ORCID,Chihai J.ORCID,Chkonia E.ORCID,Courtet P.ORCID,Cozman D.ORCID,David M.,Dom G.ORCID,Esanu A.ORCID,Falkai P.ORCID,Flannery W.,Gasparyan K.ORCID,Gerlinger G.,Gorwood P.,Gudmundsson O.ORCID,Hanon C.ORCID,Heinz A.ORCID,Dos Santos M. J. Heitor,Hedlund A.,Ismayilov F.,Ismayilov N.,Isometsä E. T.,Izakova L.,Kleinberg A.,Kurimay T.,Reitan S. Klæbo,Lecic-Tosevski D.,Lehmets A.,Lindberg N.,Lundblad K. A.,Lynch G.,Maddock C.,Malt U.F.,Martin L.,Martynikhin I.,Maruta N. O.,Matthys F.,Mazaliauskiene R.,Mihajlovic G.,Peles A. Mihaljevic,Miklavic V.,Mohr P.,Ferrandis M. Munarriz,Musalek M.,Neznanov N.,Ostorharics-Horvath G.,Pajević I.,Popova A.,Pregelj P.,Prinsen E.,Rados C.,Roig A.,Kuzman M. Rojnic,Samochowiec J.,Sartorius N.,Savenko Y.,Skugarevsky O.,Slodecki E.,Soghoyan A.,Stone D. S.,Taylor-East R.,Terauds E.,Tsopelas C.,Tudose C.,Tyano S.,Vallon P.,Van der Gaag R. J.,Varandas P.,Vavrusova L.,Voloshyn P.,Wancata J.,Wise J.,Zemishlany Z.,Öncü F.,Vahip S.

Abstract

AbstractBackground.Compulsory admission procedures of patients with mental disorders vary between countries in Europe. The Ethics Committee of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) launched a survey on involuntary admission procedures of patients with mental disorders in 40 countries to gather information from all National Psychiatric Associations that are members of the EPA to develop recommendations for improving involuntary admission processes and promote voluntary care.Methods.The survey focused on legislation of involuntary admissions and key actors involved in the admission procedure as well as most common reasons for involuntary admissions.Results.We analyzed the survey categorical data in themes, which highlight that both medical and legal actors are involved in involuntary admission procedures.Conclusions.We conclude that legal reasons for compulsory admission should be reworded in order to remove stigmatization of the patient, that raising awareness about involuntary admission procedures and patient rights with both patients and family advocacy groups is paramount, that communication about procedures should be widely available in lay-language for the general population, and that training sessions and guidance should be available for legal and medical practitioners. Finally, people working in the field need to be constantly aware about the ethical challenges surrounding compulsory admissions.

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3