Author:
Lelliott Paul,Williams Richard,Mears Alex,Andiappan Manoharan,Owen Helen,Reading Paul,Coyle Nick,Hunter Stephen
Abstract
BackgroundExpert clinical judgement combines technical proficiency with humanistic qualities.AimsTo test the psychometric properties of questionnaires to assess the humanistic qualities of working with colleagues and relating to patients using multisource feedback.MethodAnalysis of self-ratings by 347 consultant psychiatrists and ratings by 4422 colleagues and 6657 patients.ResultsMean effectiveness as rated by self, colleagues and patients, was 4.6, 5.0 and 5.2 respectively (where 1=very low and 6=excellent). The instruments are internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha > 0.95). Principal components analysis of the colleague questionnaire yielded seven factors that explain 70.2% of the variance and accord with the domain structure. Colleague and patient ratings correlate with one another (r=0.39, P<0.001) but not with the self-rating. Ratings from 13 colleagues and 25 patients are required to achieve a generalisability coefficient (Eρ2) of 0.75.ConclusionsReliable 360-degree assessment of humane judgement is feasible for psychiatrists who work in large multiprofessional teams and who have large case-loads.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献