Author:
Rosenheck Robert,Stroup Scott,Keefe Richard S. E.,McEvoy Joseph,Swartz Marvin,Perkins Diana,Hsiao John,Shumway Martha,Lieberman Jeffrey
Abstract
BackgroundMeasures have not taken account of the relative importance patients place on various outcomes.AimsTo construct and evaluate a multidimensional, preference-weighted mental health index.MethodEach of over 1200 patients identified the relative importance of improvement in six domains: social life, energy, work, symptoms, confusion and side-effects. A mental health index was created in which measures of well-being in these six domains were weighted for their personal importance.ResultsThe strongest preference was placed on reducing confusion and the least on reducing side-effects. There was no significant difference between the unweighted and preference-weighted mental health status measures and they had similar correlations with global health status measures. Patients with greater preference for functional activities such as work had less preference for medical model goals such as reducing symptoms and had less symptoms.ConclusionsA preference-weighted mental health index demonstrated no advantage over an unweighted index.
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献