Surface-wave Inversion Limitations from Laser-Doppler Physical Modeling

Author:

Bodet Ludovic1234,van Wijk Kasper1234,Bitri Adnand1234,Abraham Odile1234,Côte Philippe1234,Grandjean Gilles1234,Leparoux Donatienne1234

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, Reconnaissance et Géophysique, Nantes, France

2. Physical Acoustics Laboratory, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA

3. Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Aménagement et Risques Naturels, Orléans, France

4. Institut de Physique du Globe, Géomatériaux—Hautes Pressions, Paris, France

Abstract

Surface-wave dispersion inversion is growing in popularity for geotechnical applications, due to its noninvasive character, relative straightforward field procedures and interpretation, especially when the subsurface structure is locally assumed to be one-dimensional (1D). Here, laser-Doppler physical modeling of surface-wave propagation is used to address issues of surface-wave depth penetration, the presence of dipping layers, and the associated limitations and systematic errors propagated in conventional 1D surface-wave inversion. Flat-layered models show that, with an active source and linear spread, the maximum resolvable wavelength of the Rayleigh-wave fundamental mode is on the order of 40% of the spread length. Linearised inversions confirm the rule of thumb that the depth penetration is 20–25% of the spread length, and that correct a priori layer interface depths from refraction analysis allow more accurate results. However, even under optimal conditions, failing to account for a dominant higher mode at low frequency when a stiff shallow layer is present, causes an overestimate of deeper layer shear-wave velocity. Moreover, a layer dip of only a few degrees can significantly bias the surface-wave inversion. If the incorrect a priori information from a single-shot refraction analysis is incorporated in the inverse problem, estimated interface depth depends on the shot position and deeper layer shear-wave velocity is underestimated. Even if correct a priori constraints are used, an underestimate of half-space shear-wave velocity of up to 25% remains.

Publisher

Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Environmental Engineering

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3