Affiliation:
1. National Engineering Research Center of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration 1 , Beijing , China
2. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd 2 , Beijing , China
Abstract
Abstract
To better understand the associated thermal and mechanical effects on the elastic behaviors of shale rocks, we examine the shale rocks at reservoir stress (static) and elastic conditions (dynamic) at varying temperature (25–110°C) and pressure (5–55 MPa) conditions through coupling dynamic–static experimental measurements. The results illustrate that the shale’s P- and S-wave velocities increase with the increasing confining pressure but decrease with the elevated temperature. For the pressure history, ultrasonic P-wave velocities upon hydrostatic unloading are slightly larger than the loading ones, whereas S-wave velocities are almost overlapping together. Meanwhile, the temperature elevation causes much less velocity reduction at a higher confining pressure than lower confining pressure. The measured data demonstrate that the static bulk modulus is more sensitive to the confining pressure than the dynamic bulk modulus. Moreover, with the elevated temperature, the dynamic bulk moduli separate by showing a decreasing trend in either hydrostatic loading or unloading. The loading–unloading cycle shows that the static bulk moduli present values approaching the dynamic ones at all temperature levels when the confining pressure is initially unloaded from the maximum pressure. Both static and dynamic bulk moduli decrease with the continued unloading, with more decrement for the static bulk modulus. The coupling effects of the pressure and temperature on the static and elastic properties of shale samples imply that, in the practical shale reservoir characterization process, temperature and pressure influences should be considered to characterize the relation of dynamic and static properties of shale rocks. The laboratory investigations on shales imply that the relation of dynamic and static properties is pressure dependent mainly due to the intrinsic behavior of fracture, soft pore, and microstructure in the rock frame.
Reference27 articles.
1. “Experimental study of the brittle behavior of clay shale in rapid unconfined compression,”;Amann;Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2011
2. “Investigating hydraulic fracturing complexity in naturally fractured rock masses using fully coupled multiscale numerical modeling,”;Zhang;Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2019
3. “Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of hydrocarbon source rocks,”;Vernik;Geophysics,1992
4. “Micro-mechanical analysis of the effects of stress cycles on the dynamic and static mechanical properties of sandstone,”;Wang;International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2020
5. “Quantifying static and dynamic stiffness anisotropy and nonlinearity in finely laminated shales: Experimental measurement and modeling,”;Ramos;GEOPHYSICS,2019