Affiliation:
1. Associate Professor, Madan Bhandari Memorial Academy Nepal, Urlabari 3, Morang, Nepal
2. Engineer, Shambhunath Municipality, Local Government of Nepal
3. Professor, College of Management & Commerce, Srinivas University, Mangalore, India
Abstract
In absence of the railway at Kathmandu, Nepal, public transport effectiveness needs to be assessed. The paper aims to assess the operational performance of public transportation in Kalanki-Kalimati-Tripureshwor-Bhotahity forward 6700 m and backward 6200 m section of Kathmandu. Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for performance assessment were listed from the literature review and finalized through departmental expert consultation based on average mean score analysis of availability, cost of collection, quality and necessity of the data. Based on the finalized 4 KPI along with 29 micro KPI, performance of SajhaYatayat, bus and microbus were compared categorizing under economical, service, safety and people perception by collecting data through field survey. The economic analysis reveals that microbus has the highest internal rate of return and benefit cost ratio highest as 28.55% and 1.35 respectively while the bus has the highest revenue per kilometer and cost per kilometer as 104.94 and 79.012 respectively. Service indicators analysis reveals that SajhaYatayat has the highest travel time ratio and running time as 1425sec and 1.66, microbus has the highest journey time as 1555.86 sec, the bus has the highest running speed, journey speed and running index as 17.39 kph, 16.42 kph and 0.68 while traveling from Kalanki to Bhotahity respectively. The average passenger waiting index is 0.88. The affordability index of microbus is 4.47% respectively. Bus punctuality of SajhaYatayat is non-frequent but bus and microbus are Frequent. According to a schedule questionnaire survey with 94 respondents, the result of people perception indicators reveals that 21.27% of respondents are not satisfied with SajhaYatayat, bus and microbus. It is concluded that SajhaYatayat is performing better among three-selected public transport in the study route i.e. SajhaYatayat, bus and microbus are performing in decreasing order.
Reference19 articles.
1. Parthasarathi P., Levinson D., Hochmair H. (2013) Network Structure and Travel Time Perception. PLOS ONE 8(10): e77718. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077718
2. SajhaYatayat, (2011). https://walkeasyktm.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/revival-of-sajha-yatayatsajha-buses-to-ply-valley-roads-in-four-months/ accessed on 14 September 2020.
3. Pandey, N. (2014). Assessment of financial modality of Kathmandu -Kulekhani - Tunnel highway. M. Sc. Pokhara University.
4. Roux, Y. (2013). A Comparative study of Public Transport systems in Developing Countries, Masters, University of Cape Town.
5. SanyuktaYatayat http://samyuktayatayat.com.np/customer/samyukta.xhtml accessed on 13 September 2020.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Safety Measures Implemented at Site during COVID-19: A Case from Nepal;International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences;2023-04-26
2. Operation of Vehicle Maintenance System in Context of Developing Countries Emphasizing Nepal;International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education;2023-03-31
3. Evaluating the Impact of Disputes on Time and Cost of Projects;International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters;2023-01-18
4. Impact Assessment of COVID-19 on Remittance Inflow; A Systematic Review in Case of Nepal;SSRN Electronic Journal;2023
5. Assessing the Seeds of Disputes in Projects;International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education;2022-11-24