Investigation of Dried Blood Spot Cards for Fatty Acid Analysis Using Porcine Blood

Author:

Wood Jordan1ORCID,Minter Larry J.2ORCID,Stoskopf Michael K.3ORCID,Bibus Doug4ORCID,Ange Dempsy5,Tollefson Troy N.6ORCID,Fellner Vivek1ORCID,Ange-van Heugten Kimberly1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA

2. North Carolina Zoo, 4401 Zoo Pkwy, Asheboro, NC 27205, USA

3. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA

4. Lipid Technologies LLC, P.O. Box 216, Austin, MN 55912, USA

5. Beech Ridge Pork Farm Inc., Belhaven, NC 27810, USA

6. Mazuri® Exotic Animal Nutrition, PMI Nutrition, Land O’ Lakes, Inc.,, St. Louis, MO 63166, USA

Abstract

Fatty acids, especially omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, are important for reproductive and cardiovascular health in animals. While monitoring fatty acids is traditionally conducted using frozen blood fractions such as serum and plasma, advancements in analytical technology have developed a method of collecting microsamples of dried whole blood on Ahlstrom 226 grade filter paper that can provide information on long-term fatty acid status of animals. Blood samples were collected from five male pigs in both the traditional frozen method and on dried blood spot cards (DBS). The DBS samples were collected with untreated syringes and tubes, and approximately 320 μL of blood was placed on each card with approximately 80 μL per spot (4 spots). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the two sample groups to each other using the Mann–Whitney U-test and determine if DBS samples were similar to traditional whole blood samples. Of the 30 fatty acids and fatty acid groups with measurable concentrations, only four individual fatty acids, behenic acid, omega-3 docosapentaenoic acid, nervonic acid, and adrenic acid, had statistical differences. Most of these differences were minor and could be due to analytical errors or contamination. Comparisons between sample types found similar concentrations of key omega fatty acids and PUFAs and support the use of DBS collection as a less invasive method of blood collection and fatty acid analysis.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Veterinary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3