Survey Study among Dentist in Bulgaria to Develop a Model for Risk Management in Dental Practice

Author:

Schiller Tihomira1ORCID,Musurlieva Nina1,Bozhkova Tanya2ORCID,Kondeva Veselina3ORCID,Dimitrova Mariana3ORCID,Rimalovska Sevda3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University-Plovdiv, Bulgaria

2. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, Bulgaria

3. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University-Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Abstract

Background. Quality control and risk management in the field of dental services is an important part of improving patient safety as well as that of the dentists. The introduction of a risk management model would simplify and facilitate this process. Aim. The aim of the study is to gather information about the structurе and organization of work processes in Bulgarian dental practices, which will serve as a basis for building a risk management model. Material and Methods. A survey was conducted among randomly selected dental associations in Bulgaria-Plovdiv, Sofia, Varna, and Burgas through an anonymized questionnaire, containing 30 questions. The respondents meet the main criteria, namely, to be dentists and to practice in Bulgaria. The study includes demographic data, information on the attitude of Bulgarian dentists towards issues related to quality management, and safety and risk in respect to dental practice. The results have been processed and analyzed through descriptive and graphical analysis using the statistical program SPSS 20.0. Results. A total of 103 Bulgarian dentists took part in the study, out of which 25.24 % ± 4.28 % have acquired a specialty. Women are 52.43 % ± 4.92 % , and men 47.57 % ± 4.92 % . The largest is the relative share of the respondents in the age range of 25-35 years 63.10 % ± 4.75 % and with work experience of 6-15 years 52.43 % ± 4.92 % . Most of the respondents do not define in writing the main tasks and activities 52.43 % ± 4.92 % , and do not use checklists in their practice -54.73%. The majority of the respondents do not hold regular meetings with their teams 50.49 % ± 4.93 % , as well as they do not conduct surveys among their patients 68.93 % ± 4.56 % . The majority of the respondents 41.75 % ± 4.86 % are guided by their personal judgment in respect to whether the written information provided to patients is comprehensible and accessible. The majority of dentists 45.63 % ± 4.91 % take informed consent only for expensive procedures in written and oral form 53.40 % ± 4.92 % . Out of all the respondents, 75.73 % ± 4.22 % have not analyzed the risk of slipping in their practices for the last two years. Conclusion. There is a lack of written definition of the main tasks and processes, as well as no use of checklists in the practices of most of the interviewed dentists. Meetings with teams are held irregularly. There is a lack of surveys among patients, as well as no objective feedback from patients regarding the comprehensibility of the information materials provided. Informed consent is obtained from patients mainly in written and oral form and only for costly manipulations. In the practices of most of the interviewed dentists, there has been no assessment of the risk of slipping and falling for the last 2 years.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Risk management in clinical practice. Part 1. Introduction

2. Patient safety in dentistry:dental care risk management plan;B. Perea Pérez;Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral, Cirugia Bucal,2011

3. Rules for Good Medical Practice of Dentists;Bulgarian Ministry of Health,2020

4. Patient safety alert update: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. London;National Patient Safety Agency,2009

5. Effectiveness of Surgical Safety Checklists in Improving Patient Safety

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3