Affiliation:
1. College of Computing & Informatics, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Putrajaya Campus, Jalan Ikram-Uniten, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
Abstract
There are many methods or algorithms applicable for detecting electricity theft. However, comparative studies on supervised learning methods for electricity theft detection are still insufficient. In this paper, comparisons based on predictive accuracy, recall, precision, AUC, and F1-score of several supervised learning methods such as decision tree (DT), artificial neural network (ANN), deep artificial neural network (DANN), and AdaBoost are presented and their performances are analyzed. A public dataset from the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) was used for this study. The dataset consisted of power consumption in kWh unit. Based on the analysis results, the DANN outperforms compared to other supervised learning classifiers such as ANN, AdaBoost, and DT in recall, F1-Score, and AUC. A future research direction is the experiments can be performed on other supervised learning algorithms with different types of datasets and suitable preprocessing methods can be applied to produce better performance.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,General Computer Science,Signal Processing
Reference62 articles.
1. Identifying Nontechnical Power Loss via Spatial and Temporal Deep Learning
2. Detection of non-technical loss in power utilities using data mining techniques;R. Rajesh;International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology,2015
3. A Multi-Sensor Energy Theft Detection Framework for Advanced Metering Infrastructures
4. World loses $89.3 billion to electricity theft annually, $58.7 billion in emerging markets;N Group-LLC,2019
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献