Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis

Author:

Recio Rodríguez Manuel1ORCID,Andreu-Vázquez Cristina2,Thuissard-Vasallo Israel J.2ORCID,Cano Alonso Raquel1,Bermejo López Carmina3,Tamarit Degenhardt Ines4,Martínez Ten Pilar3,Costa André Luiz Ferreira

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain

2. Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

3. Delta Ecografía, Madrid, Spain

4. Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

There is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) pathology and non-CNS pathology. Patients referred to the Radiology Department between 2007 and 2018 for a fetal MRI after detection of an anomaly in the fetal ultrasound, a high-risk pregnancy, or an inconclusive fetal ultrasound (n = 623) were included in the study. Postnatal diagnosis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI. Fetal MRI was considered to provide additional information over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI were not detected in the fetal ultrasound or when established a pathological condition that was not detected in the fetal ultrasound. Fetal MRI provided useful information for the perinatal management and prognosis over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI changed the postnatal prognosis, leaded to the decision to legally terminate the pregnancy, changed prenatal or postnatal follow-up, or helped in the planning of prenatal or postnatal treatment. Fetal MRI offered an accurate diagnosis in 97% of cases (compared to 90.4% of fetal ultrasound; p < 0.001 ). Concordance between fetal ultrasound and fetal MRI was 92.1%. Fetal MRI provided additional information over fetal ultrasound in 23.1% of cases. In 11.6% of cases, the information was useful for the perinatal management and prognosis. In 45 cases (7.2%), fetal MRI was the only accurate diagnosis. In conclusion, fetal MRI has a superior diagnostic accuracy, especially in CNS pathology, and provides additional useful information in CNS, thoracic, and abdominal pathology.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Reference28 articles.

1. Fetal MRI:A Developing Technique for the Developing Patient

2. Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fetal Evaluation

3. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating fetal brain and abdomen malformations during pregnancy;Valevičienė;Medicina (Kaunas),2019

4. Prenatal Imaging

5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1;Glenn;AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3