Standardised shorter regimens versus individualised longer regimens for rifampin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
-
Published:2019-12-20
Issue:3
Volume:55
Page:1901467
-
ISSN:0903-1936
-
Container-title:European Respiratory Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur Respir J
Author:
Abidi Syed, Achar JayORCID, Assao Neino Mourtala Mohamed, Bang DidiORCID, Benedetti Andrea, Brode Sarah, Campbell Jonathon R.ORCID, Casas Esther C., Conradie Francesca, Dravniece Gunta, du Cros Philipp, Falzon Dennis, Jaramillo Ernesto, Kuaban Christopher, Lan Zhiyi, Lange Christoph, Li Pei Zhi, Makhmudova Mavluda, Maug Aung Kya Jai, Menzies Dick, Migliori Giovanni BattistaORCID, Miller AnnORCID, Myrzaliev Bakyt, Ndjeka Norbert, Noeske Jürgen, Parpieva Nargiza, Piubello Alberto, Schwoebel Valérie, Sikhondze Welile, Singla Rupak, Souleymane Mahamadou Bassirou, Trébucq Arnaud, Van Deun Armand, Viney Kerri, Weyer Karin, Zhang Betty Jingxuan, Ahmad Khan Faiz
Abstract
We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9–12 months (the “shorter regimen”) and individualised regimens of ≥20 months (“longer regimens”).We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD −0.15, 95% CI −0.17– −0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0–0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07–0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI −0.01–0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04–0.13).In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
Funder
World Health Organization
Publisher
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference73 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2017 . Geneva, WHO, 2018. 2. World Health Organization. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-resistant Tuberculosis – 2016 Update . Geneva, WHO, 2016. 3. A Trial of a Shorter Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis 4. World Health Organization. Position Statement on the Continued Use of the Shorter MDR-TB Regimen Following an Expedited Review of the STREAM Stage 1 Preliminary Results . Geneva, WHO, 2018. 5. Applicability of the World Health Organization recommended new shorter regimen in a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis high burden country;Javaid;Eur Respir J,2017
Cited by
60 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|