A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oral short-course regimen including bedaquiline for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: study protocol for PROSPECT
Author:
Gao Jingtao, Gao Mengqiu, Du Jian, Pang Yu, Mao Gary, Lounis Nacer, Bakare Nyasha, Jiang Yanxin, Zhan Ying, Liu YuhongORCID, Li Liang, , Rongmei Liu, Juan Du, Guihui Wu, Yi Pei, Wei Sha, Lian Shi, Hua Wang, Long Jin, Yuqing Wu, Yu Xiong, Xiaofeng Yan, Xiaohong Chen, Zhongfeng Huang, Fei Ren, Xiujie Li, Huiru An, Junwei Cui
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The lack of safe, effective, and simple short-course regimens (SCRs) for multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) treatment has significantly impeded TB control efforts in China.
Methods
This phase 4, randomized, open-label, controlled, non-inferiority trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a 9-month all-oral SCR containing bedaquiline (BDQ) versus an all-oral SCR without BDQ for adult MDR-TB patients (18–65 years) in China. The trial design mainly mirrors that of the “Evaluation of a Standardized Treatment Regimen of Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs for Patients with MDR-TB” (STREAM) stage 2 study, while also incorporating programmatic data from South Africa and the 2019 consensus recommendations of Chinese MDR/RR-TB treatment experts. Experimental arm participants will receive a modified STREAM regimen C that replaces three group C drugs, ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), and prothionamide (PTO), with two group B drugs, linezolid (LZD) and cycloserine (CS), while omitting high-dose isoniazid (INH) for confirmed INH-resistant cases. BDQ duration will be extended from 6 to 9 months for participants with Mycobacterium tuberculosis-positive sputum cultures at week 16. The control arm will receive a modified STREAM regimen B without high-dose INH and injectable kanamycin (KM) that incorporates experimental arm LZD and CS dosages, treatment durations, and administration methods. LZD (600 mg) will be given daily for ≥ 24 weeks as guided by observed benefits and harm. The primary outcome measures the proportion of participants with favorable treatment outcomes at treatment completion (week 40), while the same measurement taken at 48 weeks post-treatment completion is the secondary outcome. Assuming an α = 0.025 significance level (one-sided test), 80% power, 15% non-inferiority margin, and 10% lost to follow-up rate, each arm requires 106 participants (212 total) to demonstrate non-inferiority.
Discussion
PROSPECT aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a BDQ-containing SCR MDR-TB treatment at seventeen sites across China, while also providing high-quality data to guide SCRs administration under the direction of the China National Tuberculosis Program for MDR-TB. Additionally, PROSPECT will explore the potential benefits of extending the administration of the 9-month BDQ-containing SCR for participants without sputum conversion by week 16.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05306223. Prospectively registered on 16 March 2022 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05306223?term=NCT05306223&draw=1&rank=1 {2}.
Funder
Janssen China Research and Development Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Global tuberculosis report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO 2. World Health Organization. End TB Strategy. Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. Geneva: WHO, 2014. 3. World Health Organization. WHO treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis - 2016 update. Geneva: WHO; 2016. 4. Frank M, Adamashvili N, Lomtadze N, et al. Long-term follow-up reveals high posttreatment mortality rate among patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in the country of Georgia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(4):ofz152. 5. Van Deun A, Maug AK, Salim MA, et al. Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(5):684–92.
|
|