Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in a Chinese population with severe asthma: a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Author:

Chen RuchongORCID,Wei Liping,Dai Yuanrong,Wang Zaiyi,Yang Danrong,Jin Meiling,Xiong Cui,Li Ting,Hu Shuling,Song Jie,Chan Robert,Kumar Subramanya,Abdelkarim Azza,Zhong Nanshan

Abstract

BackgroundIn China, the prevalence of severe asthma with eosinophilic phenotype is rising, yet treatment options are limited. Mepolizumab is the first targeted biologic therapy for eosinophilic-driven disease in China. This study (clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT03562195) evaluated efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Chinese patients with severe asthma.MethodsThe phase III, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study enrolled patients aged ≥12 years with severe asthma, with two or more exacerbations in the previous year, and on inhaled corticosteroids plus at least one controller medication. Following a 1–4-week run-in, patients were randomised 1:1 to mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary end-point was annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs) through week 52. Secondary end-points were time to first CSE, frequency of CSEs requiring hospitalisation/emergency department visits or hospitalisation over 52 weeks, mean change in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 52; safety was evaluated.ResultsThe modified intention-to-treat population included 300 patients. At week 52 with mepolizumabversusplacebo, annualised rate of CSEs was 65% lower (0.45versus1.31 events per year; rate ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.24–0.50; p<0.001); time to first CSE longer (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.26–0.56; p<0.001) and number of CSEs requiring hospitalisation/emergency department visit lower (rate ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.12–0.77; p=0.012). From baseline to week 52, SGRQ score improved (p=0.001) and pre-bronchodilator FEV1increased (p=0.006). Incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups.ConclusionMepolizumab provided clinical benefits to patients with severe asthma in China and showed a favourable benefit–risk profile.

Funder

GlaxoSmithKline

Publisher

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Reference33 articles.

1. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and management of severe asthma;Lin;J Thorac Dis,2018

2. Global Iniative for Asthma (GINA) . Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2022. Available from: http://ginasthma.org/.

3. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma

4. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of omalizumab in allergic asthma (2021 version)];Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi,2022

5. Guidelines for prevention and treatment of bronchial asthma (2020 edition);Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3