Affiliation:
1. Bryansk State Technical University
Abstract
The institutes for implementing industrial policy in the Russian Federation at the present time are considered. The main activities of industrial policy, which are provided for by the Federal Law on Industrial Policy, are stated. The problems that arise in the process of carrying out industrial policy at different levels of government are analysed in detail. The paper shows that local governments do not have a budgetary interest and legally stipulated powers to fulfil industrial policy, the federal level of authority can mainly exercise universal managerial influences. Thus, it is established that at present only regional government bodies have the opportunity to carry out industrial policy measures, taking into account the characteristic features and the region problems. The paper suggests using the cubic spline function to assess the industrialization level and the factors influencing it, as well as the sensitivity coefficient to evaluate the managerial impact effectiveness on the industrial system. The presented criteria were tested in the process of assessing both the industrialization level and the state support activities for industry. The main factors of growing and developing the country’s industrial system are identified. Conclusions are drawn on the impact degree of the state programme of supporting industry and federal special-purpose programmes on target indicators for developing the country’s industry; prospects for further research are outlined.
Publisher
Bryansk State Technical University BSTU
Reference18 articles.
1. Сухарев О.С. Дисфункция на уровне макро и микро управления социально-экономическими системами // Эргодизайн. 2019. № 4(6). С. 173-178. DOI 10.30987/2619-1512-2019-2019-4-173-178. EDN CDYACN., Sukharev O.S. Dysfunction at the Level of Macro and Micro Management of Socio-Economic Systems. Ergodesign. 2019;4(6):173-178. DOI 10.30987/2619-1512-2019-2019-4-173-178.
2. Пуарье Д. Эконометрия структурных изменений (с применением сплайн-функций). М.: Финансы и статистика, 1981. 183 c., Poirier D. The Econometrics of Structural Changes with Special Emphasis on Spline Functions. Moscow: Finance and Statistics; 1981. 183 p.
3. Мантуров Д.В. О промышленной политике России на перспективу 2018-2030 гг. // Вестник МГИМО Университета. 2018. № 4 (61). С. 7-22. DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-7-22. EDN YMZUXR., Manturov D.V. On the Industrial Policy of Russia for the Future 2018-2030. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2018;4(61):7-22. DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-7-22.
4. Сорокин Д.Е., Толкачёв С.А. Условия и факторы эффективной реиндустриализации и промышленной политики России // Экономическое возрождение России. 2015. № 4 (46). С. 87-99. EDN VHGSRZ., Sorokin D.E., Tolkachev S.A. Conditions and Factors of Effective Reindustrialization and Industrial Policy of Russia. The Economic Revival of Russia. 2015;4(46):87-99.
5. Глазьев С.Ю., Архипова В.В. Оценка влияния санкций и других кризисных факторов на состояние российской экономики // Российский экономический журнал. 2018. № 1. С. 3-29. EDN WACIEH., Glaziev S.Yu., Arkhipova V.V. Sanctions and Other Crisis Factors Impact Assessment on the Russian Economy’s State. Russian Economic Journal. 2018;1:3-29.