Affiliation:
1. Bryansk State Technical University
Abstract
An analytical study of the editorial and publishing policies of journals has made it possible to substantiate a group of qualitative criteria that determine the formal and content requirements for scientific manuscripts in the process of making decisions about their publication. Considering the standards that regulate publishing processes and bibliographic business allows identifying the main elements of the publishing design of articles and the editor-in-chief, editorial board and editorial team’s requirements for manuscripts. On the ground of the identified typical stages in selecting manuscripts for publication, an expert decision support system has been developed and implemented for a formalized assessment of the scientific article quality based on standardized peer review results. The proposed expert system makes it possible to reduce the reviewers’ subjectivity level due to the review process standardization and to select the best articles for publication in the journal on the example of the online electronic edition “Ergodesign”.
Publisher
Bryansk State Technical University BSTU
Reference26 articles.
1. Бредихин С.В., Ляпунов В.М.. Щербакова С.Г. Динамика роста сети цитирования научных статей // Проблемы информатики. 2020. № 1. C. 5-20. DOI 10.24411/2073-0667-2020-10001., Bredikhin S.V., Lyapunov V.M., Shcherbakova S.G. Dynamics of the Growth of the Citation Network of Scientific Articles. Problems of Informatics. 2020;1:5-20. doi: 10.24411/2073-0667-2020-10001.
2. Киричек А. В., Морозова А.В., Спасенников В.В. Рецензирование как процедура экспертного оценивания качества научных статей // Эргодизайн. 2018. №2(02). С. 3-7. DOI 10.30987/article_5bf98b622928e6.08038377, Kirichek A.V., Morozova A.V., Spasennikov V.V. Re- view as a Procedure for Expert Evaluation of the Quality of Sci- entific Articles. Ergodesign. 2018;2(02):3-7. doi: 10.30987/article_5bf98b622928e6.08038377.
3. Логунова О.С., Ильина Е.А., Окжос К.М. Система поддержки принятия решения для оценки качества статей научного журнала // Фундаментальные исследования. 2016. № 2 (3). С. 492-497., Logunova O.S., Il'ina E.A., Okzhos K.M. Decision Sup-port System for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Journal Articles. Fundamental Research. 2016;2(3):492-497.
4. Тамбовцев В.Л. Рецензирование в современных научных коммуникациях // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2021. Т.3. №1. С.35-54. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.1.2 ., Tambovtsev V.L. Reviewing in Modern Scientific Com-. munications. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2021;3(1):35-54. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.1.2.
5. Lee C.J., Sugimoto C.R., Zhang G., Cronin B. Bias in Peer Review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;64(1): 2-17. DOI 10.1002/asi.22784 ., Lee C.J., Sugimoto C.R., Zhang G., Cronin B. Bias in Peer Review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;64(1):2-17. doi: 10.1002/asi.22784.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献