Comparative Analysis of the Quality of the Technical University Scientific Journals and Improvement Criteria-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative Analysis of the Quality of the Technical University Scientific Journals and Improvement Criteria

Published:2024-03-29 Issue:1 Volume:2024 Page:3-21
ISSN:2658-4026
Container-title:Ergodesign
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Androsov Kirill¹^ORCID,Kirichek Andrey¹^ORCID,Spasennikov Valeriy¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bryansk State Technical University

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a comparative analysis of calculating the indicators of scientific journals at Bryansk State Technical University (BSTU) in the fields of technology according to the nomenclature list of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation based on the integral rating of the Science Index information and analytical system. Analising publication activity and disagreements of the expert community in ranking journals in economic specialties is carried out. The paper identifies the directions for further improving the quality of BSTU scientific journals in technical specialties, namely: Science-Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering, Transport Engineering, Automation and Modelling in Design and Management and Ergodesign based on their expert assessments. It is shown that the priority criteria for expert evaluation are the following: academic contribution to the field of knowledge, the quality of articles and their compliance with the subject area of the journal, the policy of journals regarding the reviewing and geographical diversity of authors and members of the editorial board and editorial staff of the journal. It is proposed that in addition to the integral Science Index rating, which is a point indicator, the relevance and novelty of published journal articles is associated with analysing altmerics and visualising data.

Publisher

Bryansk State Technical University BSTU

Reference35 articles.

1. Лекторский В.А., Гусейнов А.А., Никифоров А.Л. и др. Можно ли измерять научное творчество? (материалы "круглого стола") // Вопросы философии. 2014. № 4. С. 50-74. EDN SDXJRJ., Lektorsky V.A., Guseinov A.A., Nikiforov A.L., et al. Is it Possible to Measure Scientific Creativity? (a Roundtable Discussion). Voprosy Filosofii. 2014;4:50-74.

2. Алимова Н.К. Оценка научных журналов: Диссеропедия и мнение российского издательского сообщества // Научный редактор и издатель. 2019. Т. 4, № 3-4. С. 140-150. DOI 10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-140-150. EDN CONNCN., Alimova N.K. Evaluation of Scientific Journals: Disseropedia and the Opinion of the Russian Publishing Community. Scientific Editor and Publisher. 2019;4(3-4):140-150.

3. Арефьев П.Г., Еременко Г.О., Глухов В.А. Российский индекс научного цитирования - инструмент для анализа науки // Библиосфера. 2012. № S. С. 66-71. EDN PSXSLJ., Arefiev P.G., Eremenko G.O., Glukhov V.A. Russian Science Citation Index as a Tool for Analyzing Science. Bibliosfera. 2012;S:66-71.

4. Балацкий Е.В., Екимова Н.А., Третьякова О.В. Методы оценки качества научных экономических журналов // Журнал институциональных исследований. 2021. Т. 13, № 2. С. 27-52. DOI 10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.2.027-052. EDN SYGLBT., Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A., Tretyakova O.V. Evaluation Methods of Scientific Economic Journals Quality. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2021;13(2):27-52. DOI 10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.2.027-052.

5. Бедный Б.И., Сорокин Ю.М. О показателях научного цитирования и их применении // Вестник Казанского государственного энергетического университета. 2012. № 3(14). С. 155-172. EDN RAFUZR., Bedny B.I., Sorokin Yu.M. On Indicators of Scientific Citation and Its Application. Bulletin of Kazan State Energy University. 2012;3(14):155-172.